Hans van den Heuvel
REFERENCES 1. World Health Organization 2011. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies: second global survey on eHealth. ISBN:978 92 4 156 2. Topol EJ. The patient will see you now. 2015. Ingram Publisher Services. 3. World Health Organization 2019. recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. ISBN 978-92-4-155050-5 4. European Commission 2014. Green Paper: mobile Health (“mHealth”), Av ailable at: https:// ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/green-paper-mobilehealth Mol A. What Diagnostic Devices Do: The Case of Blood Sugar Measurement. Theore tical Medicine and Bioethics, January 2000, 21 (1), 9–22 5. Lupton D. The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health 2013;11:256–70. 6. Pinnock H, Hanley J, McCloughan L, Todd A, Krishnan A. Effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services on hospital admission for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: researcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;347:f6070. 7. van den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, van Solinge WW, Lely AT, Franx A, et al. eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care: An Overview of the Literature. J Med Internet Res 2018 Jun 05;20(6):e202 8. Woo VG, Lundeen T, Matula S, Milstein A. Achieving higher-value obstetrical care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):250 e1- e14. 9. Hutcheon JA, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(4):391- 403. 10. NICE guideline. NG133 Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management; 2019 ; 10- 07-2019. 11. Lisonkova S1, Sabr Y, Mayer C, Young C, Skoll A, Joseph KS. Maternal morbidity associated with early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):771-81. 12. Hodgkinson JA, Tucker KL, Crawford C, Greenfield SM, Heneghan C, Hinton L, et al. Is self monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy safe and effective? BMJ 2014 Nov 18;349(1):g6616-g6616. 13. Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Chan S, Gafni A, Gruslin A, Helewa M, et al. Women’s views of their experiences in the CHIPS (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study) Pilot Trial. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2007;26(4):371-87. 14. Lanssens et al ; Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey. JMIR 2019, 15;21(4):e10887 15. van den Heuvel JFM, Kariman SS, van Solinge WW, Franx A, Lely AT, Bekker MN. SAFE@HOME - Feasibility study of a telemonitoring platform combining blood pressure and preeclampsia symptoms in pregnancy care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;240:226-31. 16. van den Heuvel JFM, Lely AT, Huisman JJ, Trappenburg JCA, Franx A, Bekker MN. SAFE@ HOME: Digital health platform facilitating a new care path for women at increased risk of preeclampsia - a case-control study. Pregnancy Hypertens 2020 Jul 18;22:30-36 [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 18] 17. Lilford: Evaluating eHealth: How to Make Evaluation More Methodologically Robust PloS Med, 6(11): e1000186 18. Jaspers MW; A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: CHAPTER 7 120
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0