Hans van den Heuvel
8 REFERENCES 1. Cauldwell M, Dos Santos F, Steer PJ, et al. Pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease. BMJ 2018;360:k478. 2. Piccoli GB, Cabiddu G, Attini R, et al. Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;26(8):2011-22. 3. Hamilton BE, Martin, J.A., Osterman, M.J.K. et al. . Births: provisional data for 2016. Vital statistics rapid release, no 2. . Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics, 2017. 4. Queenan JT. Management of High‐Risk Pregnancy: John Wiley And Sons Ltd, 2012. 5. NICE Guideline CG107 Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management. 2010 (updated in 2011). (accessed 15-11-2018). 6. RCOG. Green-top Guideline No.31 - The Investigation and Management of the Small–for– Gestational–Age Fetus. 2014. 7. NICE Guideline NG25 Preterm labour and birth. 2015. (accessed 15-11-2018). 8. Leichtentritt RD, Blumenthal N, Elyassi A, et al. High-risk pregnancy and hospitalization: the women’s voices. Health Soc Work 2005;30(1):39-47. 9. Mercer RT, Ferketich SL. Stress and social support as predictors of anxiety and depression during pregnancy. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1988;10(2):26-39. 10. Rubarth LB, Schoening AM, Cosimano A, et al. Women’s experience of hospitalized bed rest during high-risk pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2012;41(3):398-407. 11. Lederman RP, Boyd E, Pitts K, et al. Maternal development experiences of women hospitalized to prevent preterm birth. Sex Reprod Healthc 2013;4(4):133-8. 12. Kent RA, Yazbek M, Heyns T, et al. The support needs of high-risk antenatal patients in prolonged hospitalisation. Midwifery 2015;31(1):164-9. 13. Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, et al. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7(8):e016242. 14. Iribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, et al. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One 2017;12(2):e0170581. 15. van den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, et al. eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care: An Overview of the Literature. J Med Internet Res 2018;20(6):e202. 16. Schramm K, Lapert F, Nees J, et al. Acceptance of a new non-invasive fetal monitoring system and attitude for telemedicine approaches in obstetrics: a case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018;298(6):1085-93. 17. Boatin AA, Wylie B, Goldfarb I, et al. Wireless fetal heart rate monitoring in inpatient full-term pregnant women: testing functionality and acceptability. PLoS One 2015;10(1):e0117043. 18. Chung Y, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Validation and compliance of a home monitoring device in pregnancy: microlife WatchBP home. Hypertens Pregnancy 2009;28(3):348-59. 19. Tuttas CA. Lessons learned using Web conference technology for online focus group interviews. Qual Health Res 2015;25(1):122-33. 20. Thrul J, Belohlavek A, Hambrick D, et al. Conducting online focus groups on Facebook to inform health behavior change interventions: Two case studies and lessons learned. Internet Interv 2017;9:106-11. 21. Byatt N, Hicks-Courant K, Davidson A, et al. Depression and anxiety among high-risk obstetric inpatients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2014;36(6):644-9. 22. Kerner R YY, Belkin A, Ben-Haroush A, Zeevi B, Hod M. Maternal self-administered fetal heart rate monitoring and transmission from home in high-risk pregnancies. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2004;84(1):33-39. 23. Rauf Z, O’Brien E, Stampalija T, et al. Home labour inductionwith retrievable prostaglandin pessary and continuous telemetric trans-abdominal fetal ECG monitoring. PLoS One 2011;6(11):e28129. 24. O’Brien E, Rauf Z, Alfirevic Z, et al. Women’s experiences of outpatient induction of labour with remote continuous monitoring. Midwifery 2013;29(4):325-31. 25. Overdijkink SB, Velu AV, Rosman AN, et al. The Usability and Effectiveness of Mobile Health Technology-Based Lifestyle and Medical Intervention Apps Supporting Health Care During Pregnancy: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6(4):e109. 26. Rasekaba TM, Furler J, Blackberry I, et al. Telemedicine interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes research and clinical practice 2015;110(1):1-9. 27. Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. N Engl J Med 2016;375(2):154-61. 28. Lucivero F, Jongsma KR. A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics. J Med Ethics 2018;44(10):685-89. USER EXPERIENCES OF HOME-BASED TELEMONITORING IN PREGNANCY 139
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0