Hans van den Heuvel
9 17. Lanssens D, Vandenberk T, Thijs IM, Grieten L, Gyselaers W. Effectiveness of Telemonitoring in Obstetrics: Scoping Review; J Med Internet Res 2017;19(9):e327 PMID: 28954715 18. Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, BrooksM. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. Aug 3 2017;7(8):e016242. 19. O’Brien E, Rauf Z, Alfirevic Z, et al. Women’s experiences of outpatient induction of labour with remote continuous monitoring. Midwifery 2013;29(4):325-31. PMID: 23159160 20. Lanssens D, Vandenberk T, Lodewijckx J, Peeters T, Storms V, Thijs IM, Grieten L, Gyselaers W. Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently DeliveredMothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 15;21(4):e10887. PMID: 30985286; 21. Grassl N, Nees J, Schramm K, Spratte J, Sohn C, Schott TC, Schott S. A Web-Based Survey Assessing the Attitudes of Health Care Professionals in Germany Toward the Use of Telemedicine in Pregnancy Monitoring: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 8;6(8):e10063. PMID: 30089606; 22. Iribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, et al. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One 2017;12(2):e0170581. PMID: 28152012 23. Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. NEngl J Med; 2016;375(2):154-161 PMID: 27410924 CURRENT PRACTICE OF HOME-BASED TELEMONITORING IN THE NETHERLANDS 157
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0