Hans van den Heuvel

REFERENCES 1. Topol EJ. A decade of digital medicine innovation. Sci Trans Med. (2019) 11:7610. 2. O’Brien E, Atkins N, Stergiou G, Karpettas N, Parati G, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(1):23-38. 3. Bello NA, Woolley JJ, Cleary KL, Falzon L, Alpert BS, Oparil S, et al. Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies. Hypertension. 2018;71(2):326-35. 4. Tucker KL, Bankhead C, Hodgkinson J, et al. How Do Home and Clinic Blood Pressure Readings Compare in Pregnancy? Hypertension. Sep 2018;72(3):686-694. 5. World Health Organization. (2016) Monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions: a practical guide to conducting research and assessment. World Health Organization. https:// apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/252183. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO 6. Lanssens D, Vonck S, Storms V, Thijs IM, Grieten L, Gyselaers W. The impact of a remote monitoring program on the prenatal follow-up of women with gestational hypertensive disorders. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;223:72-8. 7. Kalafat E, Leslie K, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Pregnancy outcomes following home blood pressure monitoring in gestational hypertension. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2019;18:14-20. 8. Perry H, Sheehan E, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Home blood-pressure monitoring in a hypertensive pregnant population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(4):524-30. 9. Tucker KL, Taylor KS, Crawford C, Hodgkinson JA, Bankhead C, Carver T, Ewers E, Glogowska M, Greenfield SM, Ingram L, Hinton L, Khan KS, Locock L, Mackillop L, McCourt C, Pirie AM, Stevens R, McManus RJ. Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017;17(1):442. 10. Hod M, Kerner R. Telemedicine for antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies with ambulatory and home fetal heart ratemonitoring--an update. J Perinat Med; 2003;31(3):195- 200 11. Nitulescu A, Crisan-Vida M, Stoicu-Tivadar L, Bernad E. Integrated wireless sensor network for monitoring pregnant women. Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015;210:354-358 12. Vermeulen-Giovagnoli B, Peters C, van der Hout-van der Jagt MB, Mischi M, van Pul C, Cottaar EJ, Oei SG. The development of an obstetric tele-monitoring system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015;2015:177-180 13. Rauf Z, O’Brien E, Stampalija T, Ilioniu FP, Lavender T, Alfirevic Z. Home labour induction with retrievable prostaglandin pessary and continuous telemetric trans-abdominal fetal ECG monitoring. PLoS One; 2011;6(11):e28129 14. Boatin AA, Wylie B, Goldfarb I, et al. Wireless fetal heart rate monitoring in inpatient full-term pregnant women: testing functionality and acceptability. PLoS One 2015;10(1):e0117043. 15. Tapia-Conyer R, Lyford S, Saucedo R, Casale M, Gallardo H, Becerra K, Mack J, Mujica R, Estrada D, Sanchez A, Sabido R, Meier C, Smith J. Improving perinatal care in the rural regions worldwide by wireless enabled antepartum fetal monitoring: a demonstration project. Int J Telemed Appl; 2015;2015(2015:794180):794180 16. Harkey KT, Casale MB, Pantelooulos AA, Zurcher MA. Assessing the clinical use of a novel, mobile fetal monitoring device. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:556. 17. Mugyenyi, G.R., Atukunda, E.C., Ngonzi, J. et al. Functionality and acceptability of a wireless fetal heart rate monitoring device in term pregnant women in rural Southwestern Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17, 178 (2017). CHAPTER 11 190

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0