Hans van den Heuvel

REFERENCES 1. Hutcheon JA, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(4):391-403. 2. NICE CG 133 Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management (updated in 2019) 3. Stevens W, Shih T, Incerti D, Ton TGN, Lee HC, Peneva D, Macones GA, Sibai BM, Jena AB. Short- term costs of preeclampsia to the United States health care system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):237-48 e16 4. Woo VG, Lundeen T, Matula S, Milstein A. Achieving higher-value obstetrical care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):250 e1- e14. 5. Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Chan S, et al. Women’s views of their experiences in the CHIPS (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study) Pilot Trial. Hypertens Pregnancy; 2007;26(4):371-387 6. Hodgkinson JA, Tucker KL, Crawford C, et al. Is self monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy safe and effective? BMJ. 2014;349:g6616. 7. van den Heuvel JFM, Kariman SS, van Solinge WW, Franx A, Lely AT, Bekker MN. SAFE@HOME - Feasibility study of a telemonitoring platform combining blood pressure and preeclampsia symptoms in pregnancy care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;240:226-31. 8. Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Hypertensive disorders or pregnancy (2011) 9. Van Den Heuvel JFM, Lely AT, Franx A, Bekker MN. Validation of the iHealth Track and Omron HEM-9210T automated blood pressure devices for use in pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2019;15:37-41. 10. Tranquilli AL, Dekker G, Magee L, Roberts J, Sibai BM, Steyn W, et al. The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014;4(2):97-104. 11. Performance and Tariffs Specialist Medical Care (Prestaties en tarieven medisch- specialistische zorg) [Internet database resource]. DutchHealthcareAuthorirty (Nederlandse Zorgauthoriteit). 2017. 12. Roijen LH-v, Linden Nvd, Bouwmans C, Kanters T, Tan SS. Manual for cost analyses, methods and standard prices for economic evaluations in healthcare. Diemen, the Netherlands: Zorginstituut Nederland, 2015. 13. Consumerprices, priceindex [database on the Internet]. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS, Statistics Netherlands). 2019 [10-10-2019]. Available from: https://opendata.cbs.nl/ 14. Utrecht UMC. Jaardocument 2017 UMC Utrecht (Annual Report 20 17, UMC Utrecht). https:// www.umcutrecht.nl/getmedia/25603658-6e6e-4468-9259-173 4e03a5282/UMC-Utrecht - Jaardocument-2017.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf 15. Barton JR, Istwan NB, Rhea D, Collins A, Stanziano GJ. Cost-savings analysis of an outpatient management program for women with pregnancy-related hypertensive conditions. Dis Manag. 2006 Aug;9(4):236-41. 16. Lanssens D, Vandenberk T, Smeets CJ, et al. Prenatal Remote Monitoring of Women With Gestational Hypertensive Diseases: Cost Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e102. 17. Xydopoulos G, Perry H, Sheehan E,et al Home blood-pressure monitoring in a hypertensive pregnant population: cost minimisation study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. 18. Perry H, Sheehan E, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Home blood-pressure monitoring in a hypertensive pregnant population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(4):524-30. 19. Lanssens D, Vonck S, Storms V, et al The impact of a remote monitoring program on the prenatal follow-up of women with gestational hypertensive disorders. EJOG 2018;223:72- 20. van den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, et al. eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care: An Overview of the Literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e202. 21. Radin JM, Topol EJ, Steinhubl SR. A digital toolkit for improved maternal health. The Lancet. 2018;392(10153). 22. Sanyal C, Stolee P, Juzwishin D, Husereau D (2018) Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 13(6): e0198112. 23. Iribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, Stone PW. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170581 CHAPTER 6 98