Caren van Roekel

230 Chapter 9 ABSTRACT Purpose The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of an anti-reflux catheter improves tumor targeting for colorectal cancer patients with unresectable, chemorefractory liver metastases (mCRC) treated with holmium-166 ( 166 Ho)-radioembolization. Materials and Methods In this prospective, within-patient randomized study, left and right hepatic perfusion territories were randomized between infusion with a Surefire® anti-reflux catheter or a standard microcatheter. The primary outcome was the difference in tumor to non-tumor (T/N) activity distribution. Secondary outcomes included the difference in infusion efficiency, absorbed doses, predictive value of 166 Ho-scout, dose-response relation, and survival. Results Twenty-one patients were treated in this study (the intended number of patients was 25). The median T/N activity concentration ratio with the use of the anti-reflux catheter was 3.2 (range 0.9-8.7) versus 3.6 (range 0.8-13.3) with a standard microcatheter. There was no difference in infusion efficiency (0.04% vs. 0.03% residual activity for the standard microcatheter and anti- reflux catheter, respectively) (95%CI -0.05 – 0.03). No influence of the anti-reflux catheter on the dose-response rate was found. Median overall survival was 7.8 months (95%CI 6-13). Conclusion Using a Surefire® anti-reflux catheter did not result in a higher T/N activity concentration ratio in mCRC patients treated with 166 Ho- radioembolization, nor did it result in improved secondary outcomes measures. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02208804, registered August 5 th 2014. Keywords: radioembolization, holmium-166, colorectal cancer, anti-reflux catheter, Surefire