Xuxi Zhang

Supplementary Table S3 GRADE results peer support for type 2 diabetes Bibliography: The Glycemic Control Effect of Peer Support for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta ‐ analysis on Randomized Clinical Trials Outcomes No of Participants (studies) Follow up Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Anticipated absolute effects Risk difference with Peer support (95% CI) Overall results of peer support intervention effect 3946 (20 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 1 due to imprecision The mean overall results of peer support intervention effect in the intervention groups was 0.16 lower (0.25 to 0.007 lower) Effect of interventions no more than 3 months 926 (5 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 2 due to imprecision The mean effect of interventions no more than 3 months in the intervention groups was 0.01 lower (0.16 lower to 0.15 higher) Effect of interventions more than 3 months but no more than 6 months 1468 (9 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 3 due to imprecision The mean effect of interventions more than 3 months but no more than 6 months in the intervention groups was 0.28 lower (0 higher to 0.09 lower) Effect of intervention no less than 12 months 1552 (6 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH The mean effect of intervention no less than 12 months in the intervention groups was 0.21 lower (0.34 to 0.07 lower) Effect of intervention provided by peer leaders (PLI) 2755 (12 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 4 due to imprecision The mean effect of intervention provided by peer leaders (pli) in the intervention groups was 0.08 lower (0.18 to 0.03 lower) Effect of intervention provided by peer partners (PPI) 254 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 5 due to risk of bias The mean effect of intervention provided by peer partners (ppi) in the intervention groups was 0.49 lower (0.86 to 0.12 lower) Effect of intervention provided by community health workers (CHWI) 937 (6 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH 6 The mean effect of intervention provided by community health workers (chwi) in the intervention groups was 0.35 lower (0 higher to 0.16 lower) Effect of TDI 1062 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH 7 The mean effect of tdi in the intervention groups was 0.12 lower (0.31 lower to 0.07 higher) Effect of SGI 609 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH The mean effect of sgi in the intervention groups was 0.13 lower (0.29 lower to 0.04 higher) Effect of COI 488 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 5,8 due to risk of bias, imprecision The mean effect of coi in the intervention groups was 0.01 higher (0.23 lower to 0.25 higher) Effect of CCRI 1189 (7 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 9 due to imprecision The mean effect of ccri in the intervention groups was 0.24 lower (0.43 to 0.06 lower) Effect of HVI 598 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 5,6 due to risk of bias The mean effect of hvi in the intervention groups was 6 155 Peer support among adults with type 2 diabetes