Xuxi Zhang
Supplementary Table S2 P ‐values for interactions between socio‐demographic variables and frailty as well as three domains on PCS and MCS Items PCS MCS P ‐value P ‐value frailty*country 0.068 0.001 frailty*age 0.144 0.148 frailty*sex 0.658 0.658 frailty*live situation 0.089 0.074 frailty*educational level 0.686 0.568 physical frailty*country 0.237 0.002 physical frailty*age 0.186 0.456 physical frailty*sex 0.587 0.610 physical frailty*live situation 0.056 0.217 physical frailty*educational level 0.483 0.154 psychological frailty*country 0.137 0.051 psychological frailty*age 0.312 0.553 psychological frailty*sex 0.005 0.088 psychological frailty*live situation 0.334 0.423 psychological frailty*educational level 0.142 0.214 social frailty*country 0.830 0.313 social frailty*age 0.666 0.518 social frailty*sex 0.548 0.244 social frailty*live situation 0.601 0.118 social frailty*educational level 0.789 0.338 Note: Abbreviations: PCS, Physical Component Suammary summarized by the SF‐12; MCS, Mental Component Suammary summarized by the SF‐12. UNIANOVA was adopted for interaction analyses with correction of covariates including age, sex, country, education level and live situation. After applying Boneferroni correction for multiple testing (P=0.05/40=0.001), no statistically significant interaction was found. 2 45 Association between frailty and HRQoL
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0