Xuxi Zhang

REFERENCES 1. Sutton, JL, Gould, RL, Daley, S, et al. Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: A systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2016;16:55. 2. Dent, E, Kowal, P, Hoogendijk, EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review. Eur J Intern Med 2016;31:3 ‐ 10. 3. Kojima, G. Frailty as a Predictor of Future Falls Among Community ‐ Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta ‐ Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015;16(12):1027 ‐ 1033. 4. Fried, LP, Tangen, CM, Walston, J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56(3):M146 ‐ 156. 5. Gobbens, RJ, Schols, JM, van Assen, MA. Exploring the efficiency of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: a review. Clin Interv Aging 2017;12:1739 ‐ 1752. 6. Shamliyan, T, Talley, KM, Ramakrishnan, R, et al. Association of frailty with survival: a systematic literature review. Ageing Res Rev 2013;12(2):719 ‐ 736. 7. Dent, E, Martin, FC, Bergman, H, et al. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet 2019;394(10206):1376 ‐ 1386. 8. Hoogendijk, EO, Afilalo, J, Ensrud, KE, et al. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet 2019;394(10206):1365 ‐ 1375. 9. van Assen, MA, Pallast, E, Fakiri, FE, et al. Measuring frailty in Dutch community ‐ dwelling older people: Reference values of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI). Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2016;67:120 ‐ 129. 10. Ensrud, KE, Ewing, SK, Taylor, BC, et al. Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women. Arch Intern Med 2008;168(4):382 ‐ 389. 11. Morley, JE, Malmstrom, TK, Miller, DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16(7):601 ‐ 608. 12. Gobbens, RJJ, van Assen, MALM, Luijkx, KG, et al. The tilburg frailty indicator: Psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010;11(5):344 ‐ 355. 13. Pialoux, T, Goyard, J, Lesourd, B. Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: a systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2012;12(2):189 ‐ 197. 14. Gobbens, RJ, van Assen, MA, Luijkx, KG, et al. The predictive validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: disability, health care utilization, and quality of life in a population at risk. The Gerontologist 2012;52(5):619 ‐ 631. 15. Santiago, LM, Luz, LL, Mattos, IE, et al. Psychometric properties of the brazilian version of the tilburg frailty indicator (TFI). Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2013;57(1):39 ‐ 45. 16. Coelho, T, Santos, R, Paul, C, et al. Portuguese version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Transcultural adaptation and psychometric validation. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015;15(8):951 ‐ 960. 17. Freitag, S, Schmidt, S, Gobbens, RJ. Tilburg frailty indicator. German translation and psychometric testing. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie 2016;49(2):86 ‐ 93. 18. Uchmanowicz, I, Jankowska ‐ Polanska, B, Uchmanowicz, B, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Polish Version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI). J Frailty Aging 2016;5(1):27 ‐ 32. 19. Vrotsou, K, Machón, M, Rivas ‐ Ruíz, F, et al. Psychometric properties of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator in older Spanish people. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2018;78:203 ‐ 212. 20. Franse, CB, van Grieken, A, Alhambra ‐ Borras, T, et al. The effectiveness of a coordinated preventive care approach for healthy ageing (UHCE) among older persons in five European cities: A pre ‐ post controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2018;88:153 ‐ 162. 21. Franse, CB, Voorham, AJJ, van Staveren, R, et al. Evaluation design of Urban Health Centres Europe (UHCE): preventive integrated health and social care for community ‐ dwelling older persons in five European cities. BMC Geriatr 2017;17(1):209. 22. Dong, L, Liu, N, Tian, X, et al. Reliability and validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) among Chinese community ‐ dwelling older people. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2017;73:21 ‐ 28. 23. Ware, J, Jr., Kosinski, M, Keller, SD. A 12 ‐ Item Short ‐ Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34(3):220 ‐ 233. 24. Suurmeijer, TP, Doeglas, DM, Moum, T, et al. The Groningen Activity Restriction Scale for measuring disability: its utility in international comparisons. Am J Public Health 1994;84(8):1270 ‐ 1273. 25. Berwick, DM, Murphy, JM, Goldman, PA, et al. Performance of a five ‐ itemmental health screening test. Med Care 1991;29(2):169 ‐ 176. 94 Chapter 4