Ietje Perfors

161 12 . Perfors IAA, Helsper CW, Noteboom EA, et al: Randomised controlled trial protocol (GRIP study): Examining the effect of involvement of a general practitioner and home care oncology nurse after a cancer diagnosis on patient reported outcomes and healthcare utilization. BMC Cancer 18, 2018 13 . Shepherd HL, Barratt A, Trevena LJ, et al: Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: a cross- over trial. [Internet]. Patient Educ Couns 84:379–85, 2011Available from: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21831558 14 . Tuinman M, Gazendam-Donofrio S, Hoekstra-Weebers J: Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: use of the Distress Thermometer. Cancer2 113:870–878, 2008 15 . Vektis: Openbaar AGB register (Translation: public AGB-code register) [Internet][cited 2018 Jun 18] Available from: https://www.agbcode.nl/Webzoeker/Zoeken 16 . CBS: Stedelijkheid per postcode [Internet][cited 2018 Jun 18] Available from: https:// www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/maatwerk/2016/41/stedelijkheid-woz-en-uitkeringen-per- postcode-2014 17 . Brédart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby J, et al: An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) [Internet]. Eur J Cancer 41:2120–2131, 2005Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier . com/retrieve/pii/S0959804905005538 18 . Bouwmans C, Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Koopmanschap M, et al: Handleiding iMTA Medical Cost Questionnaire (iMCQ). 2013 19 . Williams JG, Cheung WY, Chetwynd N, et al: Pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate the use of patient held records for the continuing care of patients with cancer. Qual Health Care 10:159–65, 2001 20 . Giesinger JM, Kieffer JM, Fayers PM, et al: Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust [Internet]. J Clin Epidemiol 69:79–88, 2016Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier . com/retrieve/pii/S0895435615003832 21 . Rumpf H, Meyer C, Hapke U, et al: Screening for mental health: validity of the MHI-5 using DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric disorders as gold standard. Psychiatry Res 105:243– 253, 2001 22 . Schwarzer R, JerusalemM: Generalized Self-Efficacy scale, in J. Weinman, S. Wright, &M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON, 1995, pp 35–37 23 . ten Klooster PM, Oostveen JCM, Zandbelt LC, et al: Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis [Internet]. Patient Educ Couns 87:125–130, 2012Available from: https:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0738399111003843 6