Ietje Perfors

73 Findings if applicable to study: 1. Uptake of intervention 2. Healthcare use 3. Patient-related outcomes 4. GP-related outcomes Uptake of intervention Not reported. Patient-related outcomes (intervention vs control) - At 6 months: attitude towards intersectoral cooperation; 59.22 vs 51.71, p = 0.055. - At 6 months ‘Not feeling left in limbo’; 65.49 vs 55.58, p=0.055. - Patient GP global assessment; • at 0 months: 71.0 vs 58.68 (p = 0.04). • at 6 months: 68.9 vs 64.02 (p = 0.44). Quality of life and performance status: nor relevant or significant differences described. Healthcare use (intervention vs control) - GPs reported regular contact; 75% vs 75%. - Patient-reported GP consultation; • at 0 months: 67.8% vs 74.8% (p = 0.583). • at 6 months: 38.0% vs 31.5% (p = 0.046). GP-related outcome (intervention vs control) - Discharge information value GP on; • Psychosocial conditions 60% vs 26% (p <0.001). • Information their patient had received 84% vs 49%, (p <0.001). - GP knowledge 94.8% vs 96.6% (NS ). - GP wish more information 21% vs 38% ( p = 0.009). - GP rate intersectoral cooperation ‘satisfactory’ 85% vs 73%, (p = 0.033). - Intersectoral contacts: 25/100 vs 17/97 GPs had ≥1 contact, p = 0.23. 3