Ietje Perfors
78 Chapter 3 References 1 . K.W.F. Kankerbestrijding Signaleringscommissie Kanker: Nazorg bij kanker: de rol van de eerstelijn (Translation: follow-up for cancer: the role of primary care). Amsterdam, KWF Kankerbestrijding, 2011 2 . Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, et al: The expanding role of primary care in cancer control [Internet]. Lancet Oncol 16:1231–1272, 2015Available from: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26431866 3 . Campbell NC, MacLeod U, Weller D: Primary care oncology: essential if high quality cancer care is to be achieved for all. [Internet]. Fam Pract 19:577–8, 2002Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12429657 4 . Smith S, Cousins G, Clyne B, et al: Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev , 2017 5 . Royal College of General Practitioners: Medical generalism1–63, 2013 6 . Ramanayake RPJC, Dilanka GVA, Premasiri LWSS: Palliative care; role of family physicians. J FamMed Prim Care 5:234–237, 2016 7 . Grunfeld E, Fitzpatrick R, Mant D, et al: Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pr 49:5 8 . Emery JD, Shaw K, Williams B, et al: The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11:38–48, 2014 9 . Ngune I, Jiwa M, McManus A, et al: Do Patients Treated for Colorectal Cancer Benefit fromGeneral Practitioner Support? A Video Vignette Study. J Med Internet Res 17:e249, 2015 10 . Pascoe SW, Neal RD, Allgar VL, et al: Psychosocial care for cancer patients in primary care? Recognition of opportunities for cancer care. Fam Pract 21:437–42, 2004 11 . Kendall M, Boyd K, Campbell C, et al: Howdo people with cancer wish to be cared for in primary care? Serial discussion groups of patients and carers. FamPract 23:644–650, 2006 12 . Aubin M, Giguère A, Martin M, et al: Interventions to improve continuity of care in the follow-up of patients with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev , 2012 13 . Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC): Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews [Internet]. 2017Available from: http://epoc.cochrane.org/ resources/epoc-resources-review-authors 14 . Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [Internet]. BMJ 336:924–926, 2008Available from: http://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0