Fehmi Keçe

Chapter 2 66 Karpianus D, Snorek M, et al. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison between multielectrode catheter and point- by-point ablation. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. 2010;33(9):1039- 46. 121. Bittner A, Monnig G, Zellerhoff S, Pott C, Kobe J, Dechering D, et al. Randomized study comparing duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency with point-by- point ablation in pulmonary vein isolation. Heart rhythm. 2011;8(9):1383-90. 122. Chun KRJ, Perrotta L, Bordignon S, Khalil J, DugoD,KonstantinouA,etal.Complications in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in 3,000 Consecutive Procedures. Balloon Versus Radiofrequency Current Ablation. 2017;3(2):154-61. 123. Kautzner J, Neuzil P, Lambert H, Peichl P, Petru J, Cihak R, et al. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2015;17(8):1229-35. 124. Natale A, Reddy VY, Monir G, Wilber DJ, Lindsay BD, McElderry HT, et al. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;64(7):647-56. 125. Kuck KH, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Natale A, Neuzil P, Saoudi N, et al. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. Heart rhythm. 2012;9(1):18-23. 126. Khairy P, Chauvet P, Lehmann J, Lambert J, Macle L, Tanguay JF, et al. Lower incidence of thrombus formation with cryoenergy versus radiofrequency catheter ablation. Circulation. 2003;107(15):2045-50. 127. Neumann T, Kuniss M, Conradi G, Janin S, Berkowitsch A, Wojcik M, et al. MEDAFI- Trial (Micro-embolization during ablation of atrial fibrillation): comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon technique vs. radiofrequency energy. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2011;13(1):37-44. 128. Ripley KL, Gage AA, Olsen DB, Van Vleet JF, Lau CP, Tse HF. Time course of esophageal lesions after catheter ablation with cryothermal and radiofrequency ablation: implication for atrio-esophageal fistula formation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2007;18(6):642-6. 129. Nagase T, Bordignon S, Perrotta L, Bologna F, Weise FK, Konstantinou A, et al. Low Risk of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Contemporary Atrial Fibrillation Ablation- Lessons From Repeat Procedures After Radiofrequency Current, Cryoballoon, and Laser Balloon. Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2018;82(6):1558-65. 130. Patel D, Mohanty P, Di Biase L, Sanchez JE, Shaheen MH, Burkhardt JD, et al. Outcomes and complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in females. Heart rhythm. 2010;7(2):167-72. 131. Tripathi B, Arora S, Kumar V, Abdelrahman M, Lahewala S, Dave M, et al. Temporal trends of in-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States: An update from Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2011-2014). Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2018. 132. Tang RB, Dong JZ, Liu XP, Fang DP, Long DY, Liu XH, et al. Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation