Hester Paanakker

220 Cable, D. M., & Parsons, C. K. (2001). Socialization tactics and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 54 (1), 1-23. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00083.x Caswell, D., Kupka, P., Larsen, F., & Van Berkel, R. (2017). The frontline delivery of welfare-to-work in context. In R. Van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka, & F. Larsen (Eds.), Frontline delivery of welfare-to-work policies in Europe. Activating the unemployed. New York: Routledge. Chao, G. T., O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (5), 730-743. Charles, M. B., De Jong, W. M., & Ryan, N. (2010). Public values in Western Europe: A temporal perspective. The American Review of Public Administration, 41 (1), 75-91. Connell, R., Fawcett, B., & Meagher, G. (2009). Neoliberalism, New Public Management and the human service professions. Journal of Sociology, 45 (4), 331-338. Craig, S. C. (2004). Rehabilitation versus control: An organizational theory of prison management. The Prison Journal, 84 (4_suppl), 92S-114S. De Bruijn, H. (2002). Performance measurement in the public sector: Strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15 (7), 578-594. De Graaf, G. (2003). Tractable morality: Customer discourses of bankers, veterinarians and charity workers. (Doctoral dissertation), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erim. (ERIM) De Graaf, G. (2005). Het beeld van diergeneeskunde studenten van hun toekomstige patiënten en klanten en professionele verantwoordelijkheid. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde, 130 (21), 654-649. De Graaf, G. (2015). The bright future of value pluralism in public administration. Administration & Society, 47 (9), 1094-1102. doi:10.1177 /0095399715598346 De Graaf, G. (2016). Conflicterende waarden in academia . Amsterdam: Inaugural lecture Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. De Graaf, G., & Huberts, L. (2008). Portraying the Nature of Corruption. Using an Explorative Case- Study Design. Public Administration Review, 68 (4), 640-653. De Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Smulders, R. (2016). Coping with public value conflicts. Administration & Society, 48 (9), 1101-1127. doi:10.1177/ 0095399714532273 De Graaf, G., & Meijer, A. J. (2018). Social Media and Value Conflicts: An Explorative Study of the Dutch Police. Public Administration Review, 00 (00), 00. doi:10.1111/puar.12914. De Graaf, G., & Meijer, A. J. (2019). Social media and value conflicts. An explorative study of the Dutch police. Public Administration Review, 79 (1), 82-92. doi:10.1111/puar.12914 De Graaf, G., & Paanakker, H. (2015). Good governance: Performance values and procedural values in conflict. The American Review of Public Administration, 45 (6), 635-652. De Graaf, G., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2008). On value differences experienced by sector switchers. Administration & Society, 40 (1), 79-103. De Graaf, G., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2010). Managing conflicting public values: Governing with integrity and effectiveness. The American Review of Public Administration, 40 (6), 623-630. De Graaf, G., Van Doeveren, V., Reynaers, A.-M., & Van der Wal, Z. (2011). Goed bestuur als management van spanningen tussen verschillende publieke waarden. Bestuurskunde, 20 (2), 5-11. De Vries, M., & Nemec, J. (2013). Public sector reform: an overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26 (1), 4- 16. DiIulio, J. J. (1987). Governing prisons: A comparative study of correctional management . New York, NY: Free Press. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New public management is dead - Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 , 467- 494. Dutch Correctional Agency. (2009a). Masterplan gevangeniswezen 2009-2014: Een nieuwe visie op capaciteitsmanagement en personeelsbeleid. [Masterplan prison sector 2009-2014: A new 220