Dunja Dreesens

150 188. Patient Decision Aids: Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; [Available from: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/odsf.html. 189. Outcomes of Interest to the Cochrane Consumers & Communication Review Group. CCCG Melbourne: La Trobe University; 2012 [Approved (Hill, S.)]. Available from: http:// cccrg.cochrane.org/author-resources. 190. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53. 191. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2014;89(9):1245-51. 192. Creatief Denken: brainstormtechnieken [Creative thinking; brainstorm techniques]: Creatief Denken; 2015 [Available from: https://www.creatiefdenken.com/nl/techniek/ brainstormtechnieken-overzicht.php. 193. Muller G. Meeting methods - pressure cooker. 2015. 194. Dirkse-Hulscher S, Talen A. Het grote werkvormenboek (The big book on interactive work methods). Amsterdam: Boom UItgevers; 2007. 195. The Savvy Professional; Increasing Your Professional IQ. 2015. 196. Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. Bmj. 2016;353:i2016. 197. Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Clinicians’ Expectations of the Benefits and Harms of Treatments, Screening, and Tests: A Systematic Review. JAMA internal medicine. 2017;177(3):407-19. 198. Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients’ expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA internal medicine. 2015;175(2):274-86. 199. Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS. Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines. Neurology Clinical practice. 2018;8(1):58-61. 200. O’Connor A, G Elwyn. IPDAS 2005: Criteria for Judging the Quality of Patient Decision Aids. In: -, editor. - -ed. -: IPDAS OHRI; 2005. p. 2-3. 201. Vandvik PO, Fog-Heen A, Agoritsas T. SHARE-IT: rapid production of online decision aids linked to guidelines for point-of-care shared-decision making. Cochrane Colloquium 2016; Seoul: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2016. 202. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. Bmj. 2008;336(7652):1049-51. 203. Wieringa S, Dreesens D, Forland F, Hulshof C, Lukersmith S, Macbeth F, et al. Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(3):87-91. 204. CONSORT. Harms - All important harms or unintended effects in each group Ottowa: CONSORT; 2010 [Available from: http://www.consort-statement.org/checklists/view/32-- consort-2010/116-harms. 205. Kaufman J, Ryan R, Glenton C, Lewin S, Bosch-Capblanch X, Cartier Y, et al. Childhood vaccination communication outcomes unpacked and organized in a taxonomy to facilitate core outcome establishment. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2017;84:173-84. 206. Willis N, Hill S, Kaufman J, Lewin S, Kis-Rigo J, De Castro Freire SB, et al. “Communicate to vaccinate”: the development of a taxonomy of communication interventions to improve routine childhood vaccination. BMC international health and human rights. 2013;13:23. 207. Group CCCR. Taxonomy of relevant outcomes. Cochrane Consumers & Communications Review Group; 2012. 208. Fonhus MS, Dalsbo TK, Johansen M, Fretheim A, Skirbekk H, Flottorp SA. Patient- mediated interventions to improve professional practice. The Cochrane database of List of references