Dunja Dreesens

152 GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):2. 230. Ring N, Ritchie K, Mandava L, al. e. A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews. NHS Quality Improvement Scotland; 2011. Contract No.: 1-84404-917-5. 231. Juritzen TI, Soberg HL, Roe C, Saebu M, Engen G, Bliksvaer T, et al. The One or the Many: Quantified Subjectivity and Aggregated Uniqueness in Qualitative Rehabilitation Research. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(1):51-9. 232. Moberg J, Alonso-Coello P, Oxman A. GRADE Working group. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) Frameworks Guidance. Version 1.1 GRADE Working group; 2015. 233. Verkerk K, Van Veenendaal H, Severens JL, Hendriks EJ, Burgers JS. Considered judgement in evidence-based guideline development. International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care / ISQua. 2006;18(5):365-9. 234. Peirce C. Philosophical writings: Dover Publications Inc.; 1986. 235. Douven I. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2011 [Available from: https://plato. stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/abduction/. 236. Popper KR. Objective knowledge; an evolutionary approach: Clarendon Press; 1979. 237. Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, Lemons J, Levins R, Loechler EL, et al. The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(9):871-6. 238. Pollock JL. The logical foundations of means-end reasoning. . Common sense, Reasoning, and Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 60-77. 239. Stolper E, Van de Wiel M, Van Royen P, Van Bokhoven M, Van der Weijden T, Dinant GJ. Gut feelings as a third track in general practitioners’ diagnostic reasoning. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(2):197-203. 240. Gigerenzer G, Brighton H. Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences. Top Cogn Sci. 2009;1(1):107-43. 241. Moreira T. Diversity in clinical guidelines: the role of repertoires of evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(9):1975-85. 242. Calderon C, Rotaeche R, Etxebarria A, Marzo M, Rico R, Barandiaran M. Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:138. 243. Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:59. 244. Lomas J. Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:41-65. 245. StatLine [Internet]. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. 2012 [cited 23 October 2012]. Available from: https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/ - /CBS/nl/. 246. Molenkamp CM, Hamers JPH, Courtens AM. Palliatieve zorg voor kinderen: maatwerk vereist. Een exploratieve studie naar zorgbehoeften, aanbod, knelpunten en mogelijke oplossingen (Palliative care for children; taylor-made approach needed. An exploratory study into care needs, care options, bottle necks and possible solutions). Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht, Cluster Zorgwetenschappen, Sectie Verplegingswetenschap.; 2005. 247. NVK. Palliatieve Zorg voor kinderen (richtlijn). Utrecht2013. 248. Karnieli-Miller O, Eisikovits Z. Physician as partner or salesman? Shared decision-making in real-time encounters. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(1):1-8. 249. van der Weijden T, Pieterse AH, Koelewijn-van Loon MS, Knaapen L, Legare F, Boivin A, et al. How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study. BMJ quality & safety. 2013;22(10):855-63. 250. Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision- List of references