Klaske van Sluis

General discussion 159 [4] I. R. Titze, Vocal fold physiology: Frontiers in basic science , vol. 7. Singular Publishing Group, 1993. [5] Y. Maryn, P. Corthals, P. Van Cauwenberge, N. Roy, and M. De Bodt, “To- ward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels,” Journal of Voice , vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 540–555, 2010. [6] M. R. Arias, J. L. Ramón, M. Campos, and J. J. Cervantes, “Acoustic anal- ysis of the voice in phonatory fistuloplasty after total laryngectomy,” Oto- laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery , vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 743–747, 2000. [7] M. H. Bellandese, J. W. Lerman, and H. R. Gilbert, “An Acoustic Anal- ysis of Excellent Female Esophageal, Tracheoesophageal, and Laryngeal Speakers,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , vol. 44, pp. 1315–1320, Dec. 2001. [8] G. W. Blood, “Fundamental frequency and intensity measurements in la- ryngeal and alaryngeal speakers,” Journal of Communication Disorders , vol. 17, pp. 319–324, Oct. 1984. [9] M. L. Ng, C.-L. I. Kwok, and S.-F. W. Chow, “Speech performance of adult cantonese-speaking laryngectomees using different types of alaryn- geal phonation,” Journal of Voice , vol. 11, pp. 338–344, Sept. 1997. [10] L. Širić, D. Šoš, M. Rosso, and S. Stevanović, “Objective assessment of tracheoesophageal and esophageal speech using acoustic analysis of voice,” Collegium antropologicum , vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 111–114, 2012. [11] R. J. Baken and R. F. Orlikoff, Clinical measurement of speech and voice . San Diego: Singular Thomson Learning, 2nd ed., 2000. [12] M. Moerman, J.-P. Martens, and P. Dejonckere, “Multidimensional assess- ment of strongly irregular voices such as in substitution voicing and spas- modic dysphonia: A compilation of own research,” Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology , vol. 40, pp. 24–29, Jan. 2015. [13] P. H. Dejonckere, P. Bradley, P. Clemente, G. Cornut, L. Crevier- Buchman, G. Friedrich, P. Van De Heyning, M. Remacle, and V. Woisard, “A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques,” European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology , vol. 258, no. 2, pp. 77–82, 2001. [14] M. Moerman, J.-P. Martens, L. Crevier-Buchman, E. Haan, S. Grand, C. Tessier, V. Woisard, and P. Dejonckere, “The INFVo perceptual rat- ing scale for substitution voicing: development and reliability,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology , vol. 263, pp. 435–439, May 2006.