Klaske van Sluis

Objective and subjective voice outcomes: a systematic review 45 [60] M. J. McAuliffe, E. C. Ward, L. Bassett, and K. Perkins, “Functional speech outcomes after laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy,” Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery , vol. 126, pp. 705–709, June 2000. [61] S. Moon, F. Raffa, R. Ojo, M. A. Landera, D. T. Weed, Z. Sargi, and D. Lundy, “Changing trends of speech outcomes after total laryngectomy in the 21st century: A single-center study: speech rehabilitation postlaryn- gectomy,” The Laryngoscope , vol. 124, pp. 2508–2512, Nov. 2014. [62] C. G. Tang and C. F. Sinclair, “Voice restoration after total laryngectomy,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America , vol. 48, pp. 687–702, Aug. 2015. [63] A. Pereira da Silva, T. Feliciano, S. Vaz Freitas, S. Esteves, and C. Almeida e Sousa, “Quality of life in patients submitted to total la- ryngectomy,” Journal of Voice , vol. 29, pp. 382–388, May 2015. [64] M. Schuster, J. Lohscheller, P. Kummer, U. Hoppe, U. Eysholdt, and F. Rosanowski, “Quality of life in laryngectomees after prosthetic voice restoration,” Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica , vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 211–219, 2003. [65] S. Singer, M. Merbach, A. Dietz, and R. Schwarz, “Psychosocial determi- nants of successful voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy,” Journal of the Chinese Medical Association , vol. 70, pp. 407–423, Oct. 2007. [66] S. Mahalingam, R. Srinivasan, and P. Spielmann, “Quality-of-life and func- tional outcomes following pharyngolaryngectomy: a systematic review of literature,” Clinical Otolaryngology , vol. 41, pp. 25–43, Feb. 2016.