Esther Mertens

82 | Chapter 4 Table 3 Correlations at Baseline between Outcomes and Moderators 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Intrapersonal domain 1. Psychological wellbeing - 2. Resilience .40 ** - 3. Sexual autonomy .51 ** .30 ** - 4. Internalizing behavior -.60 ** -.34 ** -.49 ** - Interpersonal domain 5. Interpersonal relations in the class .40 ** .23 ** .46 ** -.31 ** - 6. Externalizing behavior -.26 ** -.13 ** -.29 ** .29 ** -.28 ** - 7. Aggression -.13 ** -.04 -.23 ** .02 -.29 ** .47 ** - 8. Bullying -.06 ** -.03 -.15 ** .03 -.18 ** .17 ** .20 ** - 9. Victimization -.26 ** -.16 ** -.21 ** .25 ** -.34 ** .11 ** .12 ** .23 ** - Moderator 10. Extraversion .18 ** .19 ** .16 ** -.21 ** .07 .04 -.06 -.01 -.03 - 11. Agreeableness .12 * .07 .10 * -.01 .12 * -.12 * -.11 * .02 .01 .27 ** - 12. Conscientiousness .05 -.02 .08 .02 .01 -.14 ** -.08 -.05 .03 -.07 .23 ** - 13. Neuroticism -.31 ** -.25 ** -.24 ** .28 ** -.14 ** .12 * .01 .05 -.01 -.48 ** -.17 ** -.06 - 14. Openness .07 -.04 .05 .06 -.01 -.03 -.03 .05 -.05 .21 ** .44 ** .28 ** -.08 Note. * p < .05; ** p < .01 Results Descriptives of the outcomes per time point andmoderator at baseline are reported in Table 2 per condition. In Table 3 the correlations between outcomes and adolescents’ personality traits are presented. Personality traits were more strongly correlated with outcomes in the intrapersonal than in the interpersonal domain. Intervention Effects The main effects of the intervention conditions, the main effects of the personality traits, and the corresponding interaction effects are reported in Table 4. Compared to the Control condition, adolescents’ trajectories in the Light condition changed in the desired direction on several outcomes in the intrapersonal (i.e., psychological wellbeing, sexual autonomy, and internalizing behavior) and interpersonal (i.e., externalizing behavior and aggression) domains. Additionally, adolescents in the Standard condition had a slightly more beneficial trajectory for