Martijn van Teffelen

Interpretation bias modification for hostility 139 6 Table 3 Continued b SE t p STAXI-2S Intercept 35.07 2.31 15.19 <.001*** Time -5.26 1.47 -3.59 .001** Condition .37 3.45 .11 .914 Condition by time -.08 2.18 -.04 .970 FOAS Intercept 16.77 .80 20.91 <.001 Time -.97 .49 -2.00 .049* Condition 1.70 1.20 -2.00 .159 Condition by time -.97 .72 -1.34 .183 K10 Intercept 27.28 1.89 14.42 <.001*** Time 6.20 1.07 5.81 <.001*** Condition 2.77 2.83 .98 .329 Condition by time -3.16 1.58 -1.99 .049* Trait hostility PID-5H Intercept 1.83 .11 16.77 <.001*** Time -.08 .06 -1.31 .191 Condition .14 .16 .83 .410 Condition by time -.11 .09 -1.17 .243 AQ-H Intercept 32.81 1.37 23.96 <.001*** Time -8.37 .79 -10.56 <.001*** Condition -.30 2.05 -.15 .883 Condition by time .56 1.20 .47 .641 FOA Intercept 84.51 3.24 26.05 <.001*** Time -14.94 1.90 -7.85 <.001*** Condition 8.71 4.88 1.79 .076 Condition by time -3.90 2.89 -1.35 .181 Note . * Significant at p = .050; ** significant at p = .010; *** significant at p < .001. In all models the active control condition was chosen as reference category.