Mariken Stegmann
Blinding We cannot blind patients, GPs, or researchers because of the nature of the intervention and because patients from the intervention group will report OPT scores. However, data analysis will be performed by researchers blinded to patient allocation. Sample size In previous research in patients with cancer, a mean of 36 points (standard deviation 9 points) was found on the D‐SE scale, the primary outcome of the study. 23 Given that half a standard deviation is considered clinically relevant in health‐related quality of life studies, we aim to detect an effect of at least 4 points (effect size 0.44) on this scale. 29 Concerning two sided testing, with an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.2 (power 0.8); we would therefore require 80 persons in each group. Because comparison between groups is to be done immediately after consultations, we expect a low rate of loss to follow up. Accounting for a 5% loss, we aim to include 168 patients in total, or 84 per group. To ensure adequate participation, we will recruit participants from ve hospitals (eight locations). Both the doctors and participants will receive a newsletter regularly. Statistical analysis All data will be entered in a secured digital data management system. When data collection will be completed, all data will be extracted into a statistical software package. Descriptive statistics will be used to compare groups at baseline. The effect of using the OPT on decision self‐efcacy will be primarily by comparison of the mean D‐SE values, using an independent t‐test. The analysis of treatment effects will be on an intention‐ to‐ treat principle; that is, participants will be analysed by their randomisation, regardless of the actual intervention received. Per‐ protocol analyses (based on completion of the intervention) will be conducted to investigate whether deviations from the proto‐ col inuence the effect estimates. If baseline differences appear in the per‐protocol analyses, they will be adjusted for by linear regression modelling. In this model treatment arm, the hospital site and the unequally distributed baseline variables will be included as independent variables and self‐efcacy as the dependent variable. Linear regression will additionally be used to explore the modifying effects of gender, age, anxiety, depression, fatigue, tumour type, educational level, performance score, and social network, by including and testing their respective interactions with the treatment group. Embedded observational study An observational prospective cohort study of the patients in the OPT group will be performed to explore the changes in preferences for treatment goals. The rst OPT scores will be considered the baseline assessment, and patients will contact their GPs again at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months thereafter to reassess their OPT scores. As secondary outcomes, the D‐SE scale, HADS, and MFI‐ 20 will be completed at each time point (Fig. 1). OPT scores and changes over time will be described, and the association of the OPT scores with gender, age, anxiety, depression, fatigue, tumour type, disease course, educational level, performance score, and social network will be explored in a hypothesis‐generating manner. Finally, the experiences with the OPT of both patients and GPs will be assessed using a short questionnaire. Because of an expected survival rate of around 60%, we expect the number of patients that will complete this observational study to be around 50. 24 Chapter 2
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0