Mariken Stegmann

References 1.   Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JCJM. Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and  practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(10):1172–9.   2.   Mohanty S, Rosenthal RA, Russell MM, Neuman MD, Ko CY, Esnaola NF. Optimal Perioperative  Management of the Geriatric Patient: A Best Practices Guideline from the American College of  Surgeons NSQIP and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(5):930–47.   3.   Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision  making. BMJ. 1999 Sep;319(7212):766–71.   4.   Austin CA, Mohottige D, Sudore RL, Smith AK, Hanson LC. Tools to Promote Shared Decision  Making in Serious Illness. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1213–21.   5.   Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NFN, Bennett CCL, Barry MJM, Eden KBK, et al. Decision aids for people  facing health treatment or screening decisions (Review). Cochrane Libr. 2014;1(1).   6.   Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen J a., Makoul G. Patient preferences for  shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(1):9–18.   7.   Rood JAJ, Nauta IH, Witte BI, Stam F, van Zuuren FJ, Manenschijn A, et al. Shared decision‐ making and providing information among newly diagnosed patients with hematological  malignancies and their informal caregivers: Not “one‐size‐fits‐all”. Psychooncology. 2017  Dec;26(12):2040–7.   8.   Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S, et al. Assessments of  the extent to which health‐care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic  review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Heal Expect. 2015;(18(4)):542–61.   9.   Knops A, Ubbink D, Legemate D, Haes J, Goossens A. Information Communicated with  Patients in Decision Making about their Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc  Surg. 2010;(39(6)):708–13.   10.   Puts MTE, Tapscott B, Fitch M, Howell D, Monette J, Wan‐Chow‐Wah D, et al. A systematic  review of factors influencing older adults’ decision to accept or decline cancer treatment.  Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41(2):197–215.   11.   Fried TR, Tinetti M, Agostini J, Iannone L, Towle V. Health outcome prioritization to elicit  preferences of older persons with multiple health conditions. Patient Educ Couns.  2011;83:278–82.   12.   Fried TR, Tinetti ME, Iannone L, O’Leary JR, Towle V, Van Ness PH. eSupplement Health  outcome prioritization as a tool for decision making among older persons with multiple  chronic conditions. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(20):1854–6.   13.   OPTool. www.optool.nl . p. Last accessed 07092020.   14.   Fried T, Tinetti M, Iannone L, O’Leary J, Towle V, Van Ness P. Health Outcome Prioritization as  a Tool for Decision Making Among Older Persons With Multiple Chronic Conditions. Arch  Intern Med. 2011;171:1854–6.   15.   Summeren JJ Van, Haaijer‐Ruskamp FM, Schuling J. Eliciting Preferences of Multimorbid  Elderly Adults in Family Practice Using an Outcome Prioritization Tool. JAGS. 2016;   16.   Van Summeren JJGT, Schuling J, Haaijer‐Ruskamp FM, Denig P, Summeren JJ van, Schuling J,  et al. Outcome prioritisation tool for medication review in older patients with multimorbidity :  a pilot study in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(660):e501–6.   17.   Case SM, Fried TR, O’Leary J. How to ask: Older adults’ preferred tools in health outcome  prioritization. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;   18.   Ramer SJ, McCall NN, Robinson‐Cohen C, Siew ED, Salat H, Bian A, et al. Health Outcome  Priorities of Older Adults with Advanced CKD and Concordance with Their Nephrology  Providers’ Perceptions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(12):2870–8.   19.   Stegmann ME, Schuling J, Hiltermann TJN, Reyners AKL, Burger H, Berger MY, et al. Study  protocol for the OPTion randomised controlled trial on the effect of prioritising treatment  goals among older patients with cancer in a palliative setting. Maturitas. 2017;96.   20.   Guyatt GH, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck‐Ytter Y, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE an emerging  consensus on rating quality of evidence and stren. Br Med J. 2008;336(7650):924–6.   3 37 Review about the Outcome Prioritisation Tool

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0