Mariken Stegmann
Rarely used codes Almost no remarks were found about advance directives (e.g. do not resuscitate) in either referral letters or specialist letters. In some letters, a special heading regarding this subject was available, but was often not completed. In addition, psychosocial information was only very rarely found in either referral or specialist letters. One GP mentioned that psychosocial information was almost never provided in letters, but that it was often shared during telephone contact (e.g. Q9). Some specialist letters presented a summary of complaints in organ systems other than the one of primary interest, but this was rare. Equally, it was rare to receive a differential diagnosis of the other possible explanations for the complaints. Q9: In case of malignancies, I always have contact by telephone with the treating specialist in between his consultations. This provides me with relevant information on how a patient is coping. Interview with GP1. (Rural general practice, I1) Reports All patients were discussed at least once in a multidisciplinary meeting/ setting. In some departments, the comprehensive reports of these meetings were sent to the GP. In other departments, the report was available in the hospital file, but was not shared with the GP. In those cases, the conclusions of the multidisciplinary meetings were often summarised in the specialist letters. Some of these reports contained more information about alternative treatment options and the choices made compared with the specialist letters (see Q10 and Q11 for examples). Some GPs mentioned they would prefer to receive these reports, since they often provide a summary of diagnoses and planned treatment. Other GPs thought these reports did not add any value to the specialist letters. Q10: Treatment plan: in case the patient prefers a breast saving treatment, there is an indication for neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy. Otherwise mamma ablation and axillary lymph node dissection. Multidisciplinary meeting report. (Academic hospital, breast cancer, Doc101) Q11: Treatment plan: modified radical mastectomy Specialist letter. (Academic hospital, breast cancer, Doc12) Q10 and Q11 are about the same patient at the same moment. Reports of invasive diagnostic procedures (e.g. colonoscopy or bronchoscopy) were almost always sent to the GP, either separately or integrated in a specialist letter. The same held true for surgery reports. Reports from consultations with allied health professionals and medical consultants were available in the patient’s file, but were not usually detailed in the letter sent to the GP. Telephone calls Both GPs and oncology specialists mentioned that they preferred telephone contact when dealing with oncological diagnoses. However, telephone calls to other healthcare providers were rarely mentioned in either referral or specialist letters or somewhere else in the patient file. In addition, both groups of healthcare providers mentioned that it was often difficult to contact each other by telephone because of limited availability. Some GPs 6 73 Qualitative mixed-methods analysis of correspondence
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0