Carl Westin

126 Consistency and agreement in conflict resolution T ABLE 6-2: Scenario groups and designed conflict parameters, Study 1 S Rotations Aircraft Conflict Angle (CPA) TSL Aircraft 1 & 2 ID: heading, speed (speed envelope) 1 0 ◦ , 45 ◦ , 90 ◦ , 270 ◦ 22 90 ◦ cross (OM 2.60 nmi behind QS) 77 s QS: 270 ◦ , 220 kn (150-350); OM: 000 ◦ , 200 kn (120-250) 2 0 ◦ , 45 ◦ , 90 ◦ , 180 ◦ 17 90 ◦ cross (RG 2.60 nmi behind PA) 83 s RG: 225 ◦ , 220 kn (150-350); PA: 315 ◦ , 200 kn (150-250) 3 0 ◦ , 45 ◦ , 90 ◦ , 180 ◦ 14 63 ◦ cross (SM 2.54 nmi behind RG) 70 s RG: 063 ◦ , 290 kn (210-340); SM: 000 ◦ , 220 kn (170-280) 4 0 ◦ , 45 ◦ , 180 ◦ , 270 ◦ 16 127 ◦ cross (PA 3.20 nmi behind QS) 60 s QS: 296 ◦ , 200 kn (150-250); PA: 063 ◦ , 200 kn (150-250) S = Scenario; CPA = Closest Point of Approach; kn = knots; nmi = nautical miles, s = seconds, TSL = Time to Separation Loss / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / One Both QS OM QS/OM OM/QS H H H H H H H H H H S S S S S S S S S S C C C C C C C C C C C R R R R R R R R L L I I I D D D D D D D RI RI RI RI RI RI RI RD RD RD LI LI LI LD Nr. of interactions (DS 1) Aircraft choice (DS 2) Resolution type (DS 3) Direction (DS 4) 59.4% 39.1% 45.3% 14.1% 18.8% 20.3% 23.4% 23.4% 21.9% 21.9% 9.4% 9.4% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 4.7% 4.7% 4.7% 7.8% 7.8% 6.2% H = Heading; S = Speed; C = Combined; R = Right; L = Left; I = Increase; D = Decrease F IGURE 6-3: Solution distribution for the Solution parameter hierarchy in proportion (%) of total solutions, Scenario 1, Study 1.