Carl Westin

224 References 13 Parasuraman, R. and Riley, V., “Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse,” Hum. Factors , Vol. 39, No. 2, 1997, pp. 230–253. 14 Bekier, M., Automation acceptance in air traffic management , Ph.d. thesis, Dept. Aviat., Univ. New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 2013. 15 Lee, J. D. and See, K. A., “Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance,” Int. J. Hum- Comput. St. , Vol. 46, No. 1, 2004, pp. 50–80. 16 Riley, V., “Operator reliance on automation: Theory and data,” Automation and human perfor- mance: Theory and applications , edited by R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua, Erlbaum, Hills- dale, NJ, 1996, pp. 19–35. 17 Prevot, T., Homola, J. R., Martin, L. H., Mercer, J. S., and Cabrall, C. D., “Toward automated air traffic control: Investigating a fundamental paradigm shift in human/systems interaction,” Int. J. Hum-Comput. Int. , Vol. 28, No. 2, 2012, pp. 77–98. 18 Hilburn, B. and Flynn, M., “Air traffic controller and management attitudes toward automation: An empirical investigation,” 4th USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar , Santa Fe, NM, Dec. 3-7. 2001. 19 Kuchar, J. K. and Yang, L. C., “A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Sys. , Vol. 1, No. 4, 2000, pp. 179–189. 20 Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., and Pachur, T., Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior , Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2011. 21 Simon, H. A., “Rational choice and the structure of the environment,” Psychol. Rev. , Vol. 63, No. 2, 1956, pp. 129–138. 22 Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., “Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases,” Science , Vol. 185, No. 4157, sep 1974, pp. 1124–1131. 23 Averty, P., “Conflict perception by ATCS admits doubt but not inconsistency,” 6th USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar , Baltimore, MD, Jun. 27-30 2005. 24 Fothergill, S. and Neal, A., “Conflict-resolution heuristics for en route air traffic management,” Proc. HFES 57th Annual Meeting , Vol. 57, No.1, San Diego, CA, Sep. 30-Oct. 4 2013, pp. 71–75. 25 Histon, J., Li, L., and Hansman, R. J., “Airspace structure, future ATC systems, and controller complexity reduction,” Proc. 29th DASC , IEEE, Salt Lake Cuty, UT, Oct. 3-7. 2010, pp. 4.A.4– 1–4.A.4–14. 26 Nunes, A. and Mogford, R. H., “Identifying controller strategies that support the ’Picture’,” Proc. HFES 47th Annual Meeting , Vol. 47 of 1 , Denver, CO, Oct. 13-17 2003, pp. 71–75. 27 Sridhar, B., Sheth, K. S., and Grabbe, S., “Airspace complexity and its application in air traffic management,” 2nd USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar , Orlando, FL, Dec. 1-4 1998. 28 Xing, J., “Measures of information complexity and the implications for automation design,” Rep. dot/faa/am-04/17, FAA Civ. Aerospace Med. Inst., Oklahoma City, OK, Oct. 2004. 29 Kirwan, B. and Flynn, M., “Towards a cognitive tool for conflict resolution assistance: A literature review,” Rep. asa.01.cora.2.del04-a.lit, EUROCONTROL, Brussels, Belgium, Mar. 2002. 30 Averty, P., Guittet, K., and Lezaud, P., “An ordered logit model of air traffic controller’s conflict risk judgment,” ATC Quart. , Vol. 16, No. 2, 2008, pp. 101–125. 31 Flicker, R. and Fricke, M., “Improvement on the acceptance of a conflict resolution system by air traffic controllers,” 6th USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar , Baltimore, MD, Jun. 27-30 2005. 32 Lehman, S., Bolland, S., Remington, R., Humphreys, M. S., and Neal, A., “Using A* graph traversal to model conflict resolution in air traffic control,” Proc. 10th ICCM , edited by D. D. Salvucci and G. Gunzelmann, Philadelphia, PA, Aug. 5-8 2010, pp. 139–144.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw