Carl Westin

226 References 52 Dunnebeil, S., Sunyaev, A., Blohm, I., Leimeister, J. M., and Krcmar, H., “Determinants of physi- cians’ technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care,” Int. J. Med. Inform. , Vol. 81, No. 11, 2012, pp. 746–760. 53 Poon, E. G., Blumenthal, D., Jaggi, T., Honour, M. M., Bates, D. W., and Kaushal, R., “Overcom- ing barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals,” Health Affair. , Vol. 23, No. 4, 2004, pp. 184–190. 54 Yarbrough, A. K. and Smith, T. B., “Technology acceptance among physicians: A new take on TAM,” Med. Care. Res. Rev. , Vol. 64, No. 6, 2007, pp. 650–672. 55 Dzindolet, M. T., Beck, H. P., and Pierce, L. G., “Adaptive automation: Building flexibility into human-machine systems,” Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective perfor- mance within complex environments , edited by S. Burke, L. G. Pierce, and E. Salas, Vol. 6, Emerald, 2006, pp. 213–245. 56 Dekker, S. W. A. and Woods, D. D., “To intervene or not to intervene: The dilemma of manage- ment by exception,” Cogn. Technol. Work. , Vol. 1, No. 2, 1999, pp. 746–760. 57 Kaber, D. B. and Endsley, M. R., “The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task,” Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. , Vol. 5, No. 2, 2004, pp. 113–153. 58 Klein, G., Woods, D. D., Bradshaw, J. M., Hoffman, R. R., and Feltovich, P. J., “Ten challenges for making automation a “team player” in joint human-agent activity,” IEEE Intell. Syst. , Vol. 19, No. 6, 2004, pp. 91–95. 59 Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovations , Free Press, New York, NY, 3rd ed., 1983. 60 Fischer, J. E., Steiner, F., Zucol, F., Berger, C., Martignon, L., Bossart, W., Altwegg, M., and Nadal, D., “Use of simple heuristics to target macrolide prescription in children with community-acquired pneumonia,” Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. , Vol. 156, No. 10, 2002, pp. 1005–1008. 61 Loft, S., Bolland, S., Humphreys, M. S., and Neal, A., “A theory and model of conflict detection in air traffic control: Incorporating environmental constraints,” J. Exp. Psychol.-Appl. , Vol. 15, No. 2, 2009, pp. 106–124. 62 BenMessaoud, C., Kharrazi, H., and MacDorman, K. F., “Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: Contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technol- ogy,” PLoS ONE , Vol. 6, No. 1, 2011, pp. e16395. 63 Mosier, K. L. and Skitka, L. J., “Human decision makers and automated decision aids: Made for each other?” Automation and human performance: Theory and applications , edited by M. Mouloua and R. Parasuraman, Elrbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1996, pp. 201–220. 64 Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J. D., and Boyle, L. N., “Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation,” Cogn. Technol. Work , Vol. 14, No. 1, 2012, pp. 39–49. 65 Bigley, G. A. and Roberts, K. H., “The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments,” Acad. Manage. J. , Vol. 44, No. 6, 2001, pp. 1281– 1300. 66 Roberts, K. H., “Characteristics of one type of high reliability organization,” Organ. Sci. , Vol. 1, No. 2, 1990, pp. 160–176. 67 Dzindolet, M. T., Beck, H. P., Pierce, L. G., and Dawe, L. A., “A framework of automation use,” Tech. rep. arl-tr-2412, Army Res. Lab., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, Mar. 2001. 68 Lee, J. and Moray, N., “Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems,” Ergonomics , Vol. 35, No. 10, 1992, pp. 1243–1270.