Carl Westin

References 229 106 Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D., “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quart. , Vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 425–478. 107 Davis, F. D., A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results , Ph.d. thesis, Dept. Sloan School Manage., MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1985. 108 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R., “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Manage. Sci. , Vol. 35, No. 8, 1989, pp. 982–1003. 109 Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., and Angst, C. M., “Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs,” MIS Quart. , Vol. 30, No. 4, 2006, pp. 781–804. 110 Merritt, S. M. and Ilgen, D. R., “Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions,” Hum. Factors , Vol. 50, No. 2, 2008, pp. 194–210. 111 Cramer, H., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., Someren, M., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., and Wielinga, B., “The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recom- mender,” User Model. User-Adap. Inter. , Vol. 18, No. 5, 2008, pp. 455–496. 112 Dillon, A., “Human acceptance of information technology,” International encyclopedia of human factors and ergonomics , edited by W. Karwowski, Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 2001. 113 Tornatzky, L. G. and Klein, K. J., “Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implemen- tation: A meta-analysis of findings,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. , Vol. EM-29, No. 1, 1982, pp. 28–43. 114 Parasuraman, R. and Miller, C. A., “Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems,” Commun. ACM , Vol. 47, No. 4, 2004, pp. 5155. 115 Kiesler, S., Powers, A., Fussell, S. R., and Torrey, C., “Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot-like agent,” Soc. Cognition , Vol. 26, No. 2, 2008, pp. 169–181. 116 Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., and Epley, N., “Who sees human?: The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism,” Perspect. Psychol. Sci. , Vol. 5, No. 3, 2010, pp. 219–232. 117 Karr-Wisniewski, P. and Prietula, M., “CASA, WASA, and the dimensions of us,” Comput. Hum. Beh. , Vol. 26, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1761–1771. 118 Nass, C. and Moon, Y., “Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers,” J. Soc. Issues , Vol. 56, No. 1, 2000, pp. 81–103. 119 Nass, C., Moon, Y., and Carney, P., “Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer- based interviewing systems,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. , Vol. 29, No. 5, 1999, pp. 1093–1109. 120 Hayes, C. C. and Miller, C. A., Human-computer etiquette: Cultural expectations and the design implications they place on computers and technology , Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, FL, 2010. 121 Borst, C., Flach, J. M., and Ellerbroek, J., “Beyond Ecological Interface Design: Lessons from concerns and misconceptions,” IEEE Trans. Human–Mach. Syst. , Vol. 45, No. 2, 2015, pp. 164–175. 122 Vicente, K. J. and Rasmussen, J., “Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. , Vol. 22, No. 4, 1992, pp. 589–606. 123 ICAO, Rules of the air , ICAO, 10th ed., Jul. 2005. 124 Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., and Moon, Y., “Can computers be teammates?” Int. J. Hum-Comput. St. , Vol. 45, No. 6, 1996, pp. 669–678. 125 Eyben, F., W¨ollmer, M., Poitschke, T., Schuller, B., Blaschke, C., F¨arber, B., and Nguyen-Thien, N., “Emotion on the road: Necessity, acceptance, and feasibility of affective computing in the car,” Adv. Hum-Comput. Inter. , Vol. 2010, 2010, pp. 1–17.