Hester van Eeren

| Chapter 5 5 | 106 Table 3. Comparing MST with FFT average treatment effects of the treated All adolescents Study sample (N=697)  B 95% CI Externalizing problem behavior CBCL 0.14 -3.23 - 3.49 Externalizing problem behavior YSR -0.29 -2.45 - 1.90 RR 95% CI Police contact during treatment 1.61 0.98 - 3.08 Living at home after treatment 0.98 0.96 - 1.01 Engaged in school or work after treatment 1.27** 1.06 - 1.57 Youth without a court order Study sample (N=370)  B 95% CI Externalizing problem behavior CBCL -3.24* -5.97 - -0.39 Externalizing problem behavior YSR -3.33* -5.81 - -0.86 RR 95% CI Police contact during treatment 1.20 0.72 - 2.77 Living at home after treatment 0.97 0.94 - 1.01 Engaged in school or work after treatment 1.09 0.94 - 1.31 Youth with a court order Study sample (N=317)  B 95% CI Externalizing problem behavior CBCL Balance not achieved ‖ Externalizing problem behavior YSR RR 95% CI Police contact during treatment Balance not achieved ‖ Living at home after treatment Engaged in school or work after treatment * Confidence interval does not contain 0 ** Confidence interval does not contain 1 ‖ Balance was not achieved, therefore the differential effectiveness of FFT and MST could not be estimated