Hester van Eeren

Comparative effectiveness of MST and FFT | 5 133 | Table VI: Variance ratio and 5-number summary of continuous covariates after PS application in sample of youth without court order (N = 370) Variance ratio ‡ Minimum 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Maximum Age FFT 0.83 12.10 14.25 15.18 16.08 20.39 MST 11.07 14.54 15.29 16.39 17.88 CBCL Internalizing problems FFT 0.96 39.00 57.00 65.00 69.00 83.00 MST 34.00 57.75 64.00 70.00 81.00 Externalizing problems FFT 1.09 43.00 69.00 72.00 76.00 92.00 MST 46.00 68.75 73.50 77.00 88.00 Total behavioral problems FFT 1.03 44.00 65.00 70.00 74.00 84.00 MST 50.00 65.00 70.00 74.00 82.00 YSR Internalizing problems FFT 1.17 30.00 45.00 54.00 60.54 83.00 MST 30.00 46.00 53.00 62.00 81.00 Externalizing problems FFT 1.25 37.00 55.00 60.96 68.01 80.00 MST 29.00 54.00 61.00 68.00 88.00 Total behavioral problems FFT 1.18 34.00 51.00 56.06 63.20 77.00 MST 26.00 50.00 56.00 64.00 82.00 Parenting stress FFT 1.40 -1.16 1.23 2.62 3.54 7.78 MST -1.38 1.20 2.59 4.13 8.95 ‡ In the weighted sample the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the F-distribution are 0.63 and 1.37 respectively.