Mylène Jansen

KJD in regular care 125 6 References 1. Hernández-Díaz C, van Schoor N, Khalil AAF. Osteoarthritis. Comorbidity in Rheumatic Diseases. 2017;386:197–206. 2. Tonge DP, Pearson MJ, Jones SW. The hallmarks of osteoarthritis and the potential to develop personalised disease-modifying pharmacological therapeutics. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2014;22(5):609–21. 3. Patel A, Pavlou G, Mújica-Mota RE, et al . The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: A comparative analysis with projections for the United States. a study using the national joint registry dataset. The Bone and Joint Journal. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1076–81. 4. Birk M V., Iacovides I, Johnson D, et al . The false dichotomy between positive and negative affect in game play. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 2015; 799–804. 5. Weinstein AM, Rome BN, Reichmann WM, et al . Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2013 Mar 6;95(5):385–92. 6. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, et al . The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: A population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1424–30. 7. van der Woude JAD, Nair SC, Custers RJH, et al . Knee joint distraction compared to total knee arthroplasty for treatment of end stage osteoarthritis: Simulating long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness. PLOS ONE. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155524. 8. Intema F, van Roermund PM, Marijnissen ACA, et al . Tissue structure modification in knee osteoarthritis by use of joint distraction: An open 1-year pilot study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2011 Aug 1;70(8):1441–6. 9. Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, Intema F, et al . Sustained clinical and structural benefit after joint distraction in the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2013 Nov;21(11):1660–7. 10. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, et al . Five-year follow-up of knee joint distraction: Clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair in an open uncontrolled prospective study. Cartilage. 2017;8(3):263–71. 11. JansenMP, van der Weiden GS, van Roermund PM, et al . Initial tissue repair predicts long-term clinical success of knee joint distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2018;26(12):1604– 8. 12. van der Woude JAD, van Heerwaarden RJ, Spruijt S, et al . Six weeks of continuous joint distraction appears sufficient for clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee. 2016 Oct 1;23(5):785–91. 13. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial. The Bone and Joint Journal. 2017;99-B(1):51–8. 14. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017;25(3):876– 86. 15. Jansen MP, Besselink NJ, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty: Two-year clinical, radiographic, and biochemical marker outcomes of two randomized controlled trials. Cartilage. 2019 Feb 13;194760351982843. 16. Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, van der Woude JAD, et al . Knee joint distraction as an alternative surgical treatment for osteoarthritis: Rationale and design of two randomized controlled trials ( vs high tibial osteotomy and total knee prosthesis). International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2015 Aug 23;2(4):353–60. 17. Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Total knee prosthesis after knee joint distraction