Mylène Jansen

User-friendliness of a dedicated KJD device 141 7 References 1. Intema F, van Roermund PM, Marijnissen ACA, et al . Tissue structure modification in knee osteoarthritis by use of joint distraction: An open 1-year pilot study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2011 Aug 1;70(8):1441–6. 2. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, et al . The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: A population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1424–30. 3. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, et al . Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: National projections from 2010 to 2030. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2009;467(10):2606– 12. 4. Julin J, Jämsen E, Puolakka T, et al . Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis: A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010 Aug;81(4):413–9. 5. Mastbergen SC, Saris DBF, Lafeber FPJG. Functional articular cartilage repair: Here, near, or is the best approach not yet clear? Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2013 May;9(5):277–90. 6. Lafeber FP, Intema F, van Roermund PM, et al . Unloading joints to treat osteoarthritis, including joint distraction. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2006 Sep;18(5):519–25. 7. Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, Intema F, et al . Sustained clinical and structural benefit after joint distraction in the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2013 Nov;21(11):1660–7. 8. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial. The Bone and Joint Journal. 2017;99-B(1):51–8. 9. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017;25(3):876– 86. 10. Jansen MP, Besselink NJ, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty: Two-year clinical, radiographic, and biochemical marker outcomes of two randomized controlled trials. Cartilage. 2019 Feb 13;194760351982843. 11. Jansen MP, Maschek S, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Changes in cartilage thickness and denuded bone area after knee joint distraction and high tibial osteotomy – Post-hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021;10(2):368 12. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, et al . Five-year follow-up of knee joint distraction: Clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair in an open uncontrolled prospective study. Cartilage. 2017;8(3):263–71. 13. JansenMP, van der Weiden GS, van Roermund PM, et al . Initial tissue repair predicts long-term clinical success of knee joint distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2018;26(12):1604– 8. 14. Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden R, van der Woude JAD, et al . Knee joint distraction as an alternative surgical treatment for osteoarthritis: Rationale and design of two randomized controlled trials ( vs high tibial osteotomy and total knee prosthesis). International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2015 Aug 23;2(4):353–60. 15. Struik T, Jaspers JEN, Besselink NJ, et al . Technical feasibility of personalized articulating knee joint distraction for treatment of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Clinical Biomechanics. 2017 Nov 1;49:40–7. 16. Jansen MP, Boymans TAEJ, Custers RJH, et al . Knee joint distraction as treatment for osteoarthritis results in clinical and structural benefit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the limited number of studies and patients available. Cartilage. July 2020:194760352094294.