Mylène Jansen

Clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms of KJD 207 10 knee joint. Techniques in Knee Surgery. 2010 Jun;9(2):80–4. 21. Intema F, van Roermund PM, Marijnissen ACA, et al. Tissue structure modification in knee osteoarthritis by use of joint distraction: An open 1-year pilot study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2011 Aug 1;70(8):1441–6. 22. Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, Intema F, et al. Sustained clinical and structural benefit after joint distraction in the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2013 Nov;21(11):1660–7. 23. JansenMP, van der Weiden GS, van Roermund PM, et al. Initial tissue repair predicts long-term clinical success of knee joint distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2018;26(12):1604– 8. 24. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al. Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017;25(3):876– 86. 25. Jansen MP, Besselink NJ, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al. Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty: Two-year clinical, radiographic, and biochemical marker outcomes of two randomized controlled trials. Cartilage. 2019 Feb 13;12(2):181–91. 26. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al. Knee joint distraction compared with total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial. Bone and Joint Journal. 2017;99-B(1):51–8. 27. Jansen MP. Prospective one-year follow-up of clinical efficacy of knee distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis by use of the KneeReviver. In: Knee joint distraction: moving forward. 2021. p. 167–82. 28. van der Woude JAD, van Heerwaarden RJ, Spruijt S, et al. Six weeks of continuous joint distraction appears sufficient for clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee. 2016 Oct 1;23(5):785–91. 29. Struik T, Jaspers JEN, Besselink NJ, et al. Technical feasibility of personalized articulating knee joint distraction for treatment of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Clinical Biomechanics. 2017 Nov 1;49:40–7. 30. Struik T, Custers RJH, Jaspers JEN, et al. Clinical feasibility of personalized articulating knee joint distraction. Submitted. 31. Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden R, van der Woude JAD, et al. Knee joint distraction as an alternative surgical treatment for osteoarthritis: Rationale and design of two randomized controlled trials ( vs high tibial osteotomy and total knee prosthesis). International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2015 Aug 23;2(4):353–60. 32. Intema F, Thomas TP, Anderson DD, et al. Subchondral bone remodeling is related to clinical improvement after joint distraction in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2011 Jun 1;19(6):668–75. 33. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, et al. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2007 Mar;15(3):273–80. 34. Hoorntje A, Kuijer PPFM, Koenraadt KLM, et al. Return to sport and work after randomization for knee distraction versus high tibial osteotomy: Is there a difference? Journal of Knee Surgery. 2020 Nov 23. 35. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, et al. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: A population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1424–30. 36. Jansen MP, Maschek S, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al. Changes in cartilage thickness and denuded bone area after knee joint distraction and high tibial osteotomy – Post-hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 19;10(2):368. 37. Jansen MP, Mastbergen SC, Turmezei TD, et al. Knee joint distraction results in MRI cartilage thickness increase up to ten years after treatment. Submitted.