Mylène Jansen

MRI cartilage thickness after KJD and HTO 291 14 References 1. Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP. Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. The Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2115–26. 2. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003;81(9):646–56. 3. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, et al . The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014 Jul;73(7):1323–30. 4. Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, et al . Knee replacement. The Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1331–40. 5. Lützner J, Kasten P, Günther K-P, et al . Surgical options for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2009 Jun;5(6):309–16. 6. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, et al . The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: A population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1424–30. 7. Johal S, Nakano N, Baxter M, et al . Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: The past, current controversies, and future perspectives. Journal of Knee Surgery. 2018;31(10):992–8. 8. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, et al . Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A study of 14 076 matched patients from the national joint registry for EngLand and Wales. Bone and Joint Journal. 2015 Jun 1;97-B(6):793–801. 9. Amendola A, Bonasia DE. Results of high tibial osteotomy: Review of the literature. International orthopaedics. 2010 Feb;34(2):155–60. 10. Dean CS, Liechti DJ, Chahla J, et al . Clinical outcomes of high tibial osteotomy for knee instability: A systematic review. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016 Mar;4(3):2325967116633419. 11. Takahashi T, Baboolal TG, Lamb J, et al . Is knee joint distraction a viable treatment option for knee oa? – A literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Knee Surgery. 2019 Aug;32(08):788–95. 12. Efe T, Ahmed G, Heyse TJ, et al . Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: Survival and risk factor analysis at long-term follow up. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2011;12. 13. Niinimäki TT, Eskelinen A, Mann BS, et al . Survivorship of high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: Finnish registry-based study of 3195 knees. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume. 2012 Nov;94(11):1517–21. 14. Jansen MP, Besselink NJ, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty: Two-year clinical, radiographic, and biochemical marker outcomes of two randomized controlled trials. Cartilage. 2019 Feb 13;194760351982843. 15. Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, et al . Comparison of results of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with and without subchondral drilling. Arthroscopy – Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 2015 Apr 1;31(4):673–9. 16. Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, et al . Second-look arthroscopic assessment of cartilage regeneration after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy – Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 2014 Jan;30(1):72–9. 17. Intema F, van Roermund PM, Marijnissen ACA, et al . Tissue structure modification in knee osteoarthritis by use of joint distraction: An open 1-year pilot study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2011 Aug 1;70(8):1441–6. 18. Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, Intema F, et al . Sustained clinical and structural benefit after joint distraction in the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2013 Nov;21(11):1660–7.