Mylène Jansen
292 Chapter 14 19. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, et al . Five-year follow-up of knee joint distraction: Clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair in an open uncontrolled prospective study. Cartilage. 2017;8(3):263–71. 20. JansenMP, van der Weiden GS, van Roermund PM, et al . Initial tissue repair predicts long-term clinical success of knee joint distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2018;26(12):1604– 8. 21. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial. Bone and Joint Journal. 2017;99-B(1):51–8. 22. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017;25(3):876– 86. 23. Jansen MP, Mastbergen SC, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction in regular care for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A comparison with clinical trial data. PLOS ONE. 2020 Jan 22;15(1). 24. Jansen MP, Boymans TAEJ, Custers RJH, et al . Knee joint distraction as treatment for osteoarthritis results in clinical and structural benefit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the limited number of studies and patients available. Cartilage. 2020 Jul 22;194760352094294. 25. Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden R, van der Woude JAD, et al . Knee joint distraction as an alternative surgical treatment for osteoarthritis: Rationale and design of two randomized controlled trials ( vs high tibial osteotomy and total knee prosthesis). International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2015 Aug 23;2(4):353–60. 26. Martineau PA, Fening SD, Miniaci A. Anterior opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: the effect of increasing posterior tibial slope on ligament strain. Journal Canadien de Chirurgie. 2010 Aug;53(4):261–7. 27. Wirth W, Eckstein F. A technique for regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage thickness based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):737–44. 28. Buck RJ, Wyman BT, Graverand MPH Le, et al . An efficient subset of morphological measures for articular cartilage in the healthy and diseased human knee. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010 Mar;63(3):680–90. 29. Eckstein F, Buck R, Wirth W. Location-independent analysis of structural progression of osteoarthritis – Taking it all apart, and putting the puzzle back together makes the difference. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2017 Feb;46(4):404–10. 30. Buckland-Wright JC, Wolfe F, Ward RJ, et al . Substantial superiority of semiflexed (MTP) views in knee osteoarthritis: a comparative radiographic study, without fluoroscopy, of standing extended, semiflexed (MTP), and schuss views. Journal of Rheumatology. 1999 Dec;26(12):2664–74. 31. Buckland-Wright JC, Ward RJ, Peterfy C, et al . Reproducibility of the semiflexed (metatarsophalangeal) radiographic knee position and automated measurements of medial tibiofemoral joint space width in a multicenter clinical trial of knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2004 Aug;31(8):1588–97. 32. Marijnissen ACA, Vincken KL, Vos PAJM, et al . Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA): A novel method to quantify individual radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in detail. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2008 Feb 1;16(2):234–43. 33. Eckstein F, Buck RJ, Burstein D, et al . Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2008 Dec;67(12):1683– 8. 34. Graichen H, Eisenhart-Rothe R V., Vogl T, et al . Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: Technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2004 Mar;50(3):811–6. 35. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, et al . Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53(5):459–68.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0