Mylène Jansen

390 Chapter 18 References 1. Burr DB, Gallant MA. Bone remodelling in osteoarthritis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2012 Nov;8(11):665–73. 2. Donell S. Subchondral bone remodelling in osteoarthritis. EFORT Open Reviews. 2019 Jun 1;4(6):221–9. 3. Buckland-Wright C. Subchondral bone changes in hand and knee osteoarthritis detected by radiography. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2004;12(SUPLL.):10–9. 4. Neogi T. Clinical significance of bone changes in osteoarthritis. Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease. 2012;4(4):259–67. 5. Jansen MP, Boymans TAEJ, Custers RJH, et al . Knee joint distraction as treatment for osteoarthritis results in clinical and structural benefit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the limited number of studies and patients available. Cartilage. 2020 Jul 22;194760352094294. 6. Jansen MP, Besselink NJ, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty: Two-year clinical, radiographic, and biochemical marker outcomes of two randomized controlled trials. Cartilage. 2019 Feb 13;194760351982843. 7. Hoorntje A, Kuijer PPFM, Koenraadt KLM, et al . Return to sport and work after randomization for knee distraction versus high tibial osteotomy: Is there a difference? The Journal of Knee Surgery. 2020 Nov. 8. Jansen MP, Mastbergen SC, Heerwaarden RJ van, et al . Knee joint distraction in regular care for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A comparison with clinical trial data. PLOS ONE. 2020 Jan 22;15(1). 9. JansenMP, van der Weiden GS, van Roermund PM, et al . Initial tissue repair predicts long-term clinical success of knee joint distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2018;26(12):1604– 8. 10. Jansen MP, Maschek S, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Changes in cartilage thickness and denuded bone area after knee joint distraction and high tibial osteotomy – Post-hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Jan 19;10(2):368. 11. Jansen MP, Mastbergen SC, Turmezei TD, et al . Knee joint distraction results in MRI cartilage thickness increase up to ten years after treatment. Submitted. 12. Jansen MP, Mastbergen SC, Watt FE, et al . Cartilage repair activity during joint-preserving treatment may be accompanied by osteophyte formation. Submitted. 13. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017;25(3):876– 86. 14. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial. Bone and Joint Journal. 2017;99-B(1):51–8. 15. Treece GM, Gee AH, Mayhew PM, et al . High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data. Medical Image Analysis. 2010 Jun 1;14(3):276–90. 16. Turmezei TD, Treece GM, Gee AH, et al . Quantitative 3D analysis of bone in hip osteoarthritis using clinical computed tomography. European Radiology. 2016 Jul 1;26(7):2047–54. 17. MacKay JW, Kaggie JD, Treece GM, et al . Three‐dimensional surface‐based analysis of cartilage MRI data in knee osteoarthritis: Validation and initial clinical application. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2020 Oct 24;52(4):1139–51. 18. Turmezei TD, Treece GM, Gee AH, et al . Quantitative 3D imaging parameters improve prediction of hip osteoarthritis outcome. Scientific Reports. 2020 Dec 1;10(1):1–11. 19. Jansen MP, Maschek S, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction is more efficient in rebuilding