Mylène Jansen

Systematic review and meta-analysis of KJD as treatment for OA 41 2 Supplementary Figure S5 : Change in total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score compared between knee joint distraction (KJD) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and between KJD and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), both 1 and 2 years after treatment. References can be used multiple times because of division in patient cohort. CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation. Supplementary Figure S6 : Change in EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) score compared between knee joint distraction (KJD) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and between KJD and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), both 1 and 2 years after treatment. References can be used multiple times because of division in patient cohort. CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation. Supplementary Figure S7 : Change in minimum joint space width (JSW), compared between knee joint distraction (KJD) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) at 1 and 2 years after treatment, and between KJD and the untreated osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) cohort at 5 years after baseline. CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.