Mylène Jansen

Two-year results of KJD compared with HTO and TKA 75 4 References 1. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, et al . Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: National projections from 2010 to 2030. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2009;467(10):2606– 12. 2. Mastbergen SC, Saris DBF, Lafeber FPJG. Functional articular cartilage repair: Here, near, or is the best approach not yet clear? Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2013 May;9(5):277–90. 3. Efe T, Ahmed G, Heyse TJ, et al . Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: Survival and risk factor analysis at long-term follow up. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2011;12. 4. Niinimäki TT, Eskelinen A, Mann BS, et al . Survivorship of high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: Finnish registry-based study of 3195 knees. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume. 2012 Nov;94(11):1517–21. 5. Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, et al . Comparison of results of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with and without subchondral drilling. Arthroscopy – Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 2015 Apr 1;31(4):673–9. 6. Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, et al . Second-look arthroscopic assessment of cartilage regeneration after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy – Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 2014 Jan;30(1):72–9. 7. Spahn G, Klinger HM, Harth P, et al . Cartilage regeneration after high tibial osteotomyresults of an arthroscopic study. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie. 2012; 8. Intema F, van Roermund PM, Marijnissen ACA, et al . Tissue structure modification in knee osteoarthritis by use of joint distraction: An open 1-year pilot study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2011 Aug 1;70(8):1441–6. 9. Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, Intema F, et al . Sustained clinical and structural benefit after joint distraction in the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2013 Nov;21(11):1660–7. 10. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, et al . Five-year follow-up of knee joint distraction: Clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair in an open uncontrolled prospective study. Cartilage. 2017;8(3):263–71. 11. Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden R, van der Woude JAD, et al . Knee Joint distraction as an alternative surgical treatment for osteoarthritis: Rationale and design of two randomized controlled trials ( vs high tibial osteotomy and total knee prosthesis). International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2015 Aug 23;2(4):353–60. 12. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017;25(3):876– 86. 13. van der Woude JAD, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Knee joint distraction compared with total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial. Bone and Joint Journal. 2017;99-B(1):51–8. 14. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, et al . Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2007 Mar;15(3):273–80. 15. Martineau PA, Fening SD, Miniaci A. Anterior opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: the effect of increasing posterior tibial slope on ligament strain. Canadian journal of surgery Journal canadien de chirurgie. 2010 Aug;53(4):261–7. 16. Marijnissen ACA, Vincken KL, Vos PAJM, et al . Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA): A novel method to quantify individual radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in detail. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2008 Feb 1;16(2):234–43. 17. Wiegant K, van Roermund PM, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al . Total knee prosthesis after knee joint distraction