Jeroen van de Pol

78 Chapter 3 [19] Jedeloo S, Van Staa A. Q-methodologie, een werkelijke mix van kwalitatief en kwantitatief onderzoek? Kwalon. 2009;14(2):5–15. [20] Koster ES, Blom L, Philbert D et al. The Utrecht Pharmacy Practice network for Education and Research: a network of community and hospital pharmacies in The Netherlands. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(4):669-74. [21] Hackert & Braehler. FlashQ, Q-Sorting via internet. URL: http://www.hackert.biz/flashq/home [22] Barker JH. Q-methodology: an alternative approach to research in nurse education. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(8):917-25. [23] Schmolck & Atkinson. PQMethod 2.35 software. 2014. URL: http://schmolck.userweb.mwn . de/qmethod/downpqwin.htm [24] Brink M. Noordzij – Van Ekris E. Veen S et al. Openbaar Apothekers: Kenmerken van de beroepsgroep. February 20th 2017. URL: https://capaciteitsorgaan.nl/app/ uploads/2017/03/2017_03_02-5.0-Rapportage-Openbaar-Apotheker.pdf [25] Eades CE, Ferguson JS, O’Carrol RE. Public health in community pharmacy: A systematic review of pharmacist and consumer views. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:582. [26] Schindel TJ, Yuksel N, Breault R et al. Perceptions of pharmacists’ roles in the era of expanding scopes of practice. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2017;13(1):148161. [27] Napier P, Norris P, Green J et al. Can they do it? Comparing the views of pharmacists and technicians to the introduction of an advanced technician role. Int J Pharm Pract. 2016;24(2): 97-103. [28] Reber BH, Kaufman SE, Cropp F. Assessing Q-assessor: a validation study of computer-based Q sorts versus paper sorts. Operant Subj. 2000;23(4):192–209.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0