Gersten Jonker

126   Chapter 5 TABLE 2: Pre-test ANOVA Assessment modality ANOVA F(1,41) p Knowledge 3.822 .057 CBDs .221 .641 OSCEs .957 .334 Simulations 5.355 .026 Group ACTY had statistically significant higher group mean on simulations than group C, as determined by independent samples t-test: t(41)=2.314, p=.026, mean difference 6 (2), 95% CI 1 – 11. Post-test On knowledge and CBDs, there were no statistically significant differences between groups, as determinedby one-wayANOVA (Table 3). However, onOSCEs and simulations, there were statistically significant differences between groups, as determined by one- way ANOVA. TABLE 3: Post-test ANOVA Assessment modality ANOVA p Knowledge F(2,61)=0.941 .396 CBDs F(2,61)=3.272 .05 OSCEs F(2,61)=5.587 .01 Simulations F(2,55)=8.239 .001 On OSCEs, group ACTY had statistically significant higher group mean than group C, as determined by independent samples t-test: t(46)=3.068, p=.004, mean difference 8 (3), 95% CI 3 – 13. Group P had statistically significant higher group mean on OSCEs than group C, as determined by independent samples t-test: t(33)=2.325, p=.026, mean difference 5 (2), 95% CI 1 – 10. On simulations, group ACTY had statistically significant higher group mean than group C, as determined by independent samples t-test: t(39)=2.172, p=.036, mean difference 7 (3), 95% CI 1 – 13.