Gersten Jonker

200   Chapter 9 119. Watling C. The uneasy alliance of assessment and feedback. PerspectMed Educ 2016; 5(5):262- 4. 120. Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ 2019; 53(1):76-85. 121. Bould MD, Crabtree NA, Naik VN. Assessment of procedural skills in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103(4):472-83. 122. Baker K. Determining resident clinical performance. Gettingbeyond thenoise. Anesthesiology 2011; 115(4):862-78. 123. ChiuM,Tarshis J, Antoniou A, et al. Simulation-based assessment of anesthesiology residents' competence: development and implementation of the Canadian National Anesthesiology Simulation Curriculum (CanNASC). Can J Anaesth 2016; 63(12):1357-63. 124. Wanderer JP, de Oliveira Filho GR, Rothman BS, Sandberg WS, McEvoy MD. Implementation and evaluation of the Z-Score system for normalizing residency evaluations. Anesthesiology 2018; 128(1):144-58. 125. Cook DA, Kuper A, Hatala R, Ginsburg S. When assessment data are words: validity evidence for qualitative educational assessments. Acad Med 2016; 91(10):1359-69. 126. Ten Cate O, Regehr G. The power of subjectivity in the assessment of medical trainees. Acad Med 2019; 94(3):333-7. 127. Boulet JR, Murray D. Review article: assessment in anesthesiology education. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59(2):182-92. 128. Weller JM, Misur M, Nicolson S, et al. Can I leave the theatre? A key tomore reliableworkplace- based assessment. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112(6):1083-91. 129. Weller JM, Castanelli DJ, Chen Y, Jolly B. Making robust assessments of specialist trainees’ workplace performance. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118(2):207-14. 130. Castanelli DJ, Moonen-van Loon JMW, Jolly B, Weller JM. The reliability of a portfolio of workplace-based assessments in anesthesia training. Can J Anaesth 2019; 66(2):193-200. 131. Dubois DG, Lingley AJ, Ghatalia J, McConnell MM. Validity of entrustment scales within anesthesiology residency training. Can J Anaesth 2021; 68(1):53-63. 132. Crossley J, Jolly B. Making sense of work-based assessment: ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people. Med Educ 2012; 46(1):28-37. 133. Ten Cate O. Entrustment as assessment: recognizing the ability, the right, and the duty to act. J Grad Med Educ 2016; 8(2):261-2. 134. Post JA, Wittich CM, Thomas KG, et al. Rating the quality of entrustable professional activities: content validation and associations with the clinical context. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31(5):518-23. 135. Taylor DR, Park YS, Egan R, et al. EQual, a novel rubric to evaluate entrustable professional activities for quality and structure. Acad Med 2017; 92(11S AAMC Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S110-7. 136. Kealey A, Alam F, McCreath G, et al. Real-world impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the assessment of anaesthesiology residents. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125(5):e430-e2.