Gersten Jonker

Simulation at the frontier of the ZPD   83 4 19. Bearman M, Greenhill J, Nestel D. The power of simulation: a large-scale narrative analysis of learners’ experiences. Med Educ 2019; 53(4):369–79. 20. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 2010; 44(4):358–6. 21. Tavakol M, Sandars J. Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research. AMEE medical education guide no. 90 part I. Med Teach 2014; 36(9):746–56. 22. Moustakas C. Phenomenological Research Methods . 1994, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 23. Tavakol M, Sandars J. Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research. AMEE medical education guide no. 90 part II. Med Teach 2014; 36(10):838–48. 24. Borleffs J. Schakeljaar kent nu nog meerdere vormen [Transitional year now has several forms, in Dutch]. Medisch Contact 2016; 71(11):18–21. 25. Van den Broek WES, Wijnen-Meijer M, ten Cate O, van Dijk M. Medical students’ preparation for the transition to postgraduate training through final year elective rotations. GMS J Med Educ 2017; 34(5):Doc65. 26. Jonker G, Hoff RG, Max S, Kalkman CJ, ten Cate O. Connecting undergraduate and postgraduate medical education through an elective EPA-based transitional year in acute care: an early project report. GMS J Med Educ 2017; 34(5):Doc64. 27. Jonker G, Booij E, OtteWR, et al. An elective entrustable professional activity-based thematic final medical school year: an appreciative inquiry study among students, graduates, and supervisors. Adv Med Educ Pract 2018; 9:837–45. 28. EuSim. Simulation based education. https://eusim.org/ [homepage on the internet]. Accessed February 14, 2020. 29. Cheng A, Kessler D, Mackinnon R, et al. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Adv Simul (Lond) 2016; 1:25. 30. Levitt HM, Bamberg M, Creswell JW, et al. Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: the APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. Am Psychol 2018; 73(1):26–46. 31. Hopkins RM, Regehr G, Pratt DD. A framework for negotiating positionality in phenomenological research. Med Teach 2017; 39(1):20–5. 32. Young JQ, van Merrienboer J, Durning S, ten Cate O. Cognitive load theory: implications for medical education. AMEE medical education guide no. 86. Med Teach 2014; 36(5):371–84. 33. Brandao C, Collares C, Marin H. Student perception on high-fidelity simulation during the medical clerkship. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013; 192:960. 34. Corvetto MA, Taekman JM. To die or not to die? A review of simulated death. Simul Healthc 2013; 8(1):8–12. 35. Pai D, Ram S, Madan S, Soe H, Barua A. Causes of stress and their change with repeated sessions as perceived by undergraduate medical students during high-fidelity trauma simulation. Natl Med J India 2014; 27(4):192–7. 36. Fraser K, Huffman J, Ma I, et al. The emotional and cognitive impact of unexpected simulated patient death: a randomized controlled trial. Chest 2014; 145(5):958–63.