Darcy Ummels

108 | Chapter 5 References 1. Macridis S, Johnston N, Johnson S, Vallance JK. Consumer physical activity tracking device ownership and use among a population ‐ based sample of adults. PLoS One 2018;13(1):e0189298. 2. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Beweeggedrag bij personen van 4 jaar en ouder in 2018. National Instuitue for Public Health. https://www.rivm.nl/leefstijlmonitor/bewegen. 2019. 3. Maher C, Ryan J, Ambrosi C, Edney S. Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross ‐ sectional study. BMC Public Health 2017;17(1):880. 4. Mercer K, Giangregorio L, Schneider E, Chilana P, Li M, Grindrod K. Acceptance of commercially available wearable activity trackers among adults aged over 50 and with chronic illness: A mixed ‐ methods evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016;4(1):e7. 5. O’Brien T, Troutman ‐ Jordan M, Hathaway D, Armstrong S, Moore M. Acceptability of wristband activity trackers among community dwelling older adults. Geriatric Nursing 2015;36(Suppl. 2):S21–S25. 6. Preusse KC, Mitzner TL, Fausset CB, Rogers WA. Older adults’ acceptance of activity trackers. J Appl Gerontol 2017;36(2):127–155. 7. Sullivan AN, Lachman ME. Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: A review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Front Public Health 2016;4:289. 8. Ummels D, Beekman E, Moser A, Braun SM, Beurskens AJ. Patients’ experiences with commercially available activity trackers embedded in physiotherapy treatment: A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2020;42(23):3284 ‐ 3292 9. Rosenberg D, Kadokura EA, Bouldin ED, Miyawaki CE, Higano CS, Hartzler AL. Acceptability of Fitbit for physical activity tracking within clinical care among men with prostate cancer.AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2017;2016:1050 ‐ 1059. 10. Schlomann A. A case study on older adults’ long ‐ term use of an activity tracker. Gerontechnology 2017;16(2):115–124. 11. Alharbi M, Bauman A, Neubeck L, Gallagher R. (2016). Validation of Fitbit ‐ Flex as a measure of freeliving physical activity in a community ‐ based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23(14):1476–1485. 12. Beevi FH, Miranda J, Pedersen CF, Wagner S. An evaluation of commercial pedometers for monitoring slow walking speed populations. Telemed J E Health 2016;22(5):441–449. 13. Cyarto EV, Myers A, Tudor ‐ Locke C. Pedometer accuracy in nursing home and communitydwelling older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36(2):205–209. 14. Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer ‐ wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12:159. 15. Ferguson T, Rowlands AV, Olds T, Maher C. The validity of consumer ‐ level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free ‐ living conditions: a cross ‐ sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12(1):42. 16. Floegel TA, Florez ‐ Pregonero A, Hekler EB, Buman MP. Validation of consumer ‐ based hip and wrist activity monitors in older adults with varied ambulatory abilities. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2016;72(2):229–236. 8 17, Martin JB, Kr č KM, Mitchell EA, Eng JJ, Noble JW. Pedometer accuracy in slow walking older adults. Int J Ther Rehabil 2012;19(7):387–393. 18. Straiton N, Alharbi M, Bauman A, Neubeck L, Gullick J, Bhindi R, Gallagher R. (2018). The validity and reliability of consumer ‐ grade activity trackers in older, community ‐ dwelling adults: A systematic review. Maturitas 2018;112:85–93. 19. Tedesco S, Sica M, Ancillo A, Timmons S, Barton J, O’Flynn B. Accuracy of consumer ‐ level and research ‐ grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0216891. 20. Ummel, D, Beekman E, Theunissen K, Braun S, Beurskens AJ. (2018). Counting steps in activities of daily living in people with a chronic disease using nine commercially available fitness trackers: Cross ‐ sectional validity study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6(4):e70. 21. Van Blarigan EL, Kenfield SA, Tantum L, Cadmus ‐ Bertram LA, Carroll PR, Chan JM. The Fitbit one physical activity tracker in men with prostate cancer: Validation study. JMIR Cancer 2017;3(1):e5. 22. Bijnens W, Aarts J, Stevens A, Ummels D, Meijer K. Optimization and validation of an adjustable activity classification algorithm for assessment of physical behavior in elderly. Sensors 2019;19(24):5344.