Darcy Ummels

18 | Chapter 1 65. Martin JB, Kr č KM, Mitchell EA, Eng JJ, Noble JW. Pedometer accuracy in slow walking older adults. Int J Ther Rehabil 2012; 19(7): 387 ‐ 93. 66. Cyarto EV, Myers A, Tudor ‐ Locke C. Pedometer accuracy in nursing home and community ‐ dwelling older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36(2): 205 ‐ 9. 67. Nelson MB, Kaminsky LA, Dickin DC, Montoye AH. Validity of Consumer ‐ Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48(8): 1619 ‐ 28. 68. Van Remoortel H, Giavedoni S, Raste Y, et al. Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012; 9: 84. 69. Epstein DA, Kang JH, Pina LR, et al. Reconsidering the device in the drawer: lapses as a design opportunity in personal informatics. Ubicomp; 2016 Sep 12–16; Heidelberg, Germany. 70. Lazar A, Koehler C, Tanenbaum J, et al. Why we use and abandon smart devices. Ubicomp; 2015 Sep 7– 11; Osaka, Japan. 71. Harrison D, Marshall P, Bianchi ‐ Berthouze N, et al. Activity tracking: barriers, workarounds and customisation. Ubicomp; 2015 Sep 7–11; Osaka, Japan. 72. Shih PC, Han K, Poole ES, et al. Use and adoption challenges of wearable activity trackers. iConference; 2015 Mar 24–27; Newport Beach, California, USA. 73. Arma ğ an K, Çi ğ dem E. Design for physical activity: design aspects of wearable activity trackers. International Conference of Engineering Design; 2015 Jun 27–30; Milano, Italy 74. Fausset CB, Mitzner TL, Price CE, Jones BD, Brad Fain W, Rogers WA. Older Adults’ Use of and Attitudes toward Activity Monitoring Technologies. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society; 2013. 75. O'Brien T, Troutman ‐ Jordan M, Hathaway D, Armstrong S, Moore M. Acceptability of wristband activity trackers among community dwelling older adults. Geriatric nursing 2015; 36(2 Suppl): S21 ‐ 5. 76. Rasche P, Schäfer K, Theis S, Bröhl C, Wille M, Mertens A. Age ‐ related usability investigation of an activity tracker. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics 2016; 4(3/4): 187. 77. Mercer K, Giangregorio L, Schneider E, Chilana P, Li M, Grindrod K. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed ‐ Methods Evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016; 4(1): e7. 78. Rosenberg D, Kadokura EA, Bouldin ED, et al. Acceptability of Fitbit for physical activity tracking within clinical care among men with prostate cancer. AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2016 Nov 4–8; Washington, USA. 79. Limburg Meet. Limburg Meet. URL: https://www.limeconnect.nl/ (accessed: 2021 ‐ 03 ‐ 08)