Crystal Smit

Chapter 5 114 Table 5.2 Descriptive statistics of the evaluation measures of the influence agents and their peers T1 T2 M (SD) Range % ( n ) M (SD) Range General experiences with the training Enjoyment of the training 3.66 (.55) 1–4 84% (31) Duration of the training 3.09 (.59) 1–5 84% (27) Perceived autonomy-support 3.54 (.38) 1–4 97% (30) Motivating influence agents to drink more water themselves Intrinsic motivation 4.48 (1.71) 1–6 4.93 (1.20) a 1.5– 6 Water consumption 2.82 (1.97) 0–7 3.51 (2.02) a 0– 7 SSBs consumption .75 (.73) 0–7 .57 (.80) 0– 3.6 Supporting the influence agents in motivating their peers Intrinsic motivation 4.61 (1.33) 1–6 4.43 (1.48) 1– 6 Perceived social support 1.91 (.92) 1–6 2.16 (1.13) a 1– 6 Descriptive norms 3.64 (.94) 1–6 3.66 (1.18) 1– 6 Injunctive norms 3.73 (1.63) 1–6 3.33 (1.80) 1– 6 Drinking water themselves 4.10 (1.18) 1–6 95% (20) Talking about water at school or home 3.05 (.97) 1–6 76% (16) Talking about water in the social media platform 2.05 (1.32) 1–6 27% (6) Forwarding short videos about water in the social media platform 1.95 (1.02) 1–6 24% (5) Note. Percentage (%) refers to the number of influence agents with a response score of ≥ 3; a Findings from t -tests indicated significant differences over time; T1 = baseline; T2 = immediately after the start of the intervention.