Crystal Smit

An Integrated Model 3 57 Fruit and vegetables Water M SD Reported range M SD Reported range Intention T2 3.89 1.57 1-6 4.09 1.61 1-6 Attitude T1 Pleasant (item 1) 3.15 .77 1-4 3.25 .81 1-4 Tasteful (item 2) 3.37 .74 1-4 3.33 .74 1-4 Self-efficacy T1 Succeed (item 1) 4.85 1.32 1-6 5.04 1.31 1-6 Easy (item 2) 4.67 1.44 1-6 4.91 1.37 1-6 Descriptive norm parents T1 4.01 1.31 1-6 4.33 1.21 1-6 Descriptive norm friends T1 3.54 1.13 1-6 3.64 1.18 1-6 Injunctive norm parents T1 4.75 1.45 1-6 4.77 1.53 1-6 Injunctive norm friends T1 3.29 1.64 1-6 3.25 1.76 1-6 Intrinsic motivation T1 Like (item 1) 5.14 1.10 1-6 4.45 1.63 1-6 Enjoy (item 2) 4.90 1.28 1-6 4.18 1.68 1-6 Want (item 3) 5.32 1.20 1-6 5.30 1.31 1-6 Pleasant (item 4) 4.99 1.25 1-6 4.66 1.57 1-6 Note. These findings are derived from the total sample of children ( N = 953); T1 = Time 1; T2 = Time 2; T3 = Time 3; T4 = Time 4. Correlations Among Model Items Regarding the model items involving fruit and vegetable consumption, Pearson’s correlation analyses yielded the following significant relations (a complete overview of the correlations is available upon request). Participants’ Intentions to eat more fruit and vegetables was consistently associated with their Attitude (pleasant: r = .25, p < .001; tasteful: r = .21, p < .001) and Self-Efficacy toward fruit and vegetable consumption (succeed: r = .36, p < .001; easy: r = .25, p < .001), Descriptive and Injunctive Norms of parents ( r = .10, p = .029; r = .18, p < .001, respectively) and friends ( r = .15, p = .001; r = .26, p < .001, respectively). Participants’ fruit and vegetable consumption were less consistently associated with Intentions to eat more fruit and vegetables (T3 fruit: r = .11, p = .014; T4 fruit: r = .15, p = .003; T4 vegetable: r = .13, p = .007) and both Descriptive Norms (T3 fruit: r = .11, p = .014; T3 vegetable: r = .12, p = .006; T4 fruit: r = .19, p < .001) and Injunctive Norms of parents (T3 vegetable: r = .10, p = .044; T4 fruit: r = .13, p = .012). Intrinsic Motivation to eat fruit and vegetables was also less consistently associated with participants’ fruit consumption (T3 like: r = 14, p = .002; enjoy: r = .16, p < .001; want: r = .11, p = .019; pleasant: r = .13, p = .004; T4 like: r = 14, p = .003; want: