15283-B-Blokker

185 References R 39. Charlton R. Autopsy and medical education: a review. J R Soc Med 1994;87:232-6. 40. Mcphee SJ, Bottles K, Lo B, Saika G, Crommie D. To Redeem Them from Death - Reactions of Family Members to Autopsy. American Journal of Medicine 1986;80:665-71. 41. Hull MJ, Nazarian RM, Wheeler AE, Black-Schaffer WS, Mark EJ. Resident physician opinions on autopsy importance and procurement. Hum Pathol 2007;38:342-50. 42. van den Tweel JG. Autopsy pathology should become a recognised subspecialty. Virchows Arch 2008;452:585-7. 43. van den Tweel JG, Wittekind C. The medical autopsy as quality assurance tool in clinical medicine: dreams and realities. Virchows Arch 2016 Jan;468:75-81. 44. Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy rates. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:408-13. 45. Blokker BM, Weustink AC, Hunink MGM, Oosterhuis JW. Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process. PLoS One 2016;11:e0163811. 46. Council on Scientific Affairs. Autopsy. A comprehensive review of current issues. . JAMA 1987;258:364-9. 47. Benbow EW, Roberts IS. The autopsy: complete or not complete? Histopathology 2003;42:417-23. 48. Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K, Thali MJ. VIRTOPSY: minimally invasive, imaging- guided virtual autopsy. Radiographics 2006;26:1305-33. 49. Eckert WG, Garland N. The history of the forensic applications in radiology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1984;5:53-6. 50. Wullenweber R, Schneider V, Grumme T. [A computer-tomographical examination of cranial bullet wounds (author's transl)] Computertomographische Untersuchungen bei Schadel-Schuss-Verletzungen. Z Rechtsmed 1977;80:227-46. 51. Thali MJ, Dirnhofer R, Vock P. The Virtopsy Approach: 3D Optical and Radiological Scanning and Reconstruction in Forensic Medicine. CRC Press, 2009. IBSN: 978-0-8493-8178-2. 52. Bakker HMd, Bakker BSd. Forensic radiology in the Netherlands: A personal perspective Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 2017;9:56–8. 53. Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR, Lees WR. Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1996;348:1139-41. 54. Wright C, Lee RE. Investigating perinatal death: a review of the options when autopsy consent is refused. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F285-8. 55. Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, van Rijn RR. Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:141-52; quiz 259. 56. Blokker BM, Wagensveld IM, Weustink AC, Oosterhuis JW, Hunink MG. Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 2016;26:1159-79. 57. Weustink AC, Hunink MGM, Van Dijke CF, Renken NS, Krestin GP, Oosterhuis JW. Minimally invasive autopsy: An alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology 2009;250:897-904.