Wouter Leclercq

ABSTRACT Background Successfully completing a surgical informed consent process is an important element of the preoperative consult. A previous study of Dutch general surgeons demonstrated that the implementation of SIC did not meet acceptable standards. However, the quality of the SIC process in the orthopaedic surgical or plastic surgical arena is unknown. Methods Following ethical approval, an online survey investigating specifics of surgical informed consent was performed among members of the Dutch Scientific Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Dutch Society for Plastic Surgery. Results A total of 335 responses from a majority of departments of orthopaedic (86%) and plastic surgery (78%) were eligible for analysis. Scores on knowledge were poor as only 50% recognized the three basic elements of surgical informed consent (competence, exchange of information and consent). The orthopaedic group used more tools in the surgical informed consent process, such as instruction movies and websites or specialized nursing staff, compared to plastic surgery (orthopaedic: 31-50% vs. plastic: 6-30%, P=0.05- <0.001). In contrast, surgical informed consent forms were used more frequently by the plastic surgical group (orthopaedic 21% vs. plastic:42% P<0.001). Control of the efficacy of the surgical informed consent process was low, 36% in both groups. One in every seven orthopaedic or plastic surgeons was faced with an official surgical informed consent-related complaint in the previous five years. Conclusions Similar to general surgeons, Dutch orthopaedic and plastic surgeons demonstrate poor knowledge and skills regarding surgical informed consent. Increased awareness, better training and use of modern tools including standard forms and online software programs will improve the SIC process and will optimize patient care.