Lisette van Dam

Chapter 7 132 89. Saha P, Andia ME, Modarai B, et al. Magnetic resonance T1 relaxation time of venous thrombus is determined by iron processing and predicts susceptibility to lysis. Circulation . 2013;128(7):729-736. 90. Fraser DG, Moody AR, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Davidson I. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med . 2002;136(2):89-98. 91. Klok FA, Tan M, Huisman MV. Letter by Klok et al Regarding Article, “18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Detection of Recurrent Same-Site Deep Vein Thrombosis by Illuminating Recently Formed, Neutrophil-Rich Thrombus”. Circulation . 2015;131(24):e530. 92. van Dam LF, Dronkers CEA, Gautam G, et al. Diagnosis of suspected recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Blood . 2020. 93. Westerbeek RE, Van Rooden CJ, Tan M, et al. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging of the evolution of acute deep vein thrombosis of the leg. J Thromb Haemost . 2008;6(7):1087-1092. 94. Ozsvath RR, Casey SO, Lustrin ES, Alberico RA, Hassankhani A, Patel M. Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography. AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1997;169(6):1699-1707. 95. Khandelwal N, Agarwal A, Kochhar R, et al. Comparison of CT venography with MR venography in cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol . 2006;187(6):1637- 1643.