Maayke Hunfeld

77 Survey neuroprognostication 3.1 General information The respondents represented 23 European countries and 45 different PICUs with most respondents from the Netherlands (N = 26) (Table 1). The survey was completed mainly by paediatric intensivists (N = 32) and paediatric neurologists (N = 31). Fifty-three respondents (75%) worked in a University (Children’s) Hospital. Thirty-five respondents (50%) had more than ten years work experience (Appendix B, supplementary table S1). PICU characteristics are described in Appendix B, supplementary table S2. Figure 1. Flowchart of surveys included for analysis EPNS= European Paediatric Neurology Society, ESPNIC= European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Survey sent to: EPNS members (n = 1310) ESPNIC members (n = 611) Valid responses Part B completed: Cardiac arrest (n = 79) Non-European respondent (n = 2) Part D completed: Follow-up (n = 69) Part C completed: Neuro-prognostication (n = 71) Part A only completed: General information (n = 27) ( Partly) completed survey (n = 108) Figure 1. Fl wchart of surv ys included for analysis EPNS= European Paediatric Neurology Society, ESPNIC= European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care 3