Dorien Bangma

138 | CHAPTER 6 Name of test Test description Possible outcome measures Construct of measurement Social Justice Game (Schäfer & Kraneburg, 2015) Goal: to make decisions about the allocation of lottery tickets. § The participant plays against three (fictitious) players: two ‘strong players’ and one ‘weak player’. During the game, the weak player is treated unfairly by the two strong players. § The participant plays four different positions (i.e., the decision making, the allocator, the referee and the helpless). During each trial (except when playing the position of the helpless), the participant has to make a particular decision: - Trial 1 (the decision maker/profiteer): In this trial, a strong player allocates 100 tickets unfairly (i.e., 60 to himself, 40 to the participant and 0 to the weak player). The participant has to decide whether to permit or prevent this unfair allocation. - Trial 2 (the allocator/perpetrator): In this trial, the participant divides 100 tickets between himself and the two strong players. - Trial 3 (the referee/observer): In this trial, a strong player allocates 100 tickets (i.e., 50 to himself, 45 to the other strong player and 5 to the weak player). In this trial, the participant can allow the allocation or intervene. When the participant chooses to intervene, there is a chance that the participant will lose part of his/her earned tickets. - Trial 4 (the helpless): In this trial, no decisions are made by the participant. § Profiteer sensitivity (round 1). § Perpetrator sensitivity (round 2). § Observer sensitivity (round 3). Social decision- making Driver Performance Analysis System (DPAS; Weaver, 1990) Goal: maximize total number of correct answers. § For one hour, recordings of 192 driving scenarios are shown from the driver’s point of view. § After a scenario is shown, the participant must answer a multiple-choice question within 10 seconds. § Test parts: ‘Driver and Traffic Knowledge’, ‘Traffic Perceptual Skills’, ‘Recognizing and Controlling Traffic Risk, and ‘Driver and Traffic Procedures’. § Percentage correct answers (on each of the test parts). Note: Only the part ‘Recognizing and Controlling Traffic Risk’ focuses on decision making. Decision making in relation to driving Financial Competence Assessment Inventory (FCAI; Kershaw & Webber, 2008) Goal: maximize task performance. § The FCAI consists of 38 theoretical questions, practical assignments and questions about the financial situation of the participant. § The FCAI measures financial competence and consist of six domains: 1. Financial abilities 2. Financial judgment 3. Financial cognitive functioning 4. Financial management 5. Debt management 6. Financial support resources § Performance on subscales (i.e., total score on each of the six subscales). § Total score (sum of the six subscales). Financial decision- making Table continues on the next page